2020
DOI: 10.21203/rs.2.18267/v2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A qualitative study on aspects of consent for genomic research in communities with low literacy

Abstract: Background: Low literacy of study participants in Sub Saharan Africa has been associated with poor comprehension during consenting process in research participation. The concerns in comprehension are far greater when consenting to participate in genomic studies due to the complexity of the science involved. While efforts are made to explore possibilities of applying genomic technologies in diseases prevalent in Sub Saharan Africa, we ought to develop methods to improve participants’ comprehension for genomic … Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a step towards informing the contexts appropriate counselling approaches, there is a need to understand how genetic results for both SCD and SCT are communicated to families and how the approaches used influence the intended outcomes. Some studies done in Africa shared concerns on the challenges of communicating genetic results to families and therefore hinderance to comprehension (Bukini, Mbekenga, Nkya, Purvis, & Parker, 2020). This concern is shared even in places with established genetic counselling programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a step towards informing the contexts appropriate counselling approaches, there is a need to understand how genetic results for both SCD and SCT are communicated to families and how the approaches used influence the intended outcomes. Some studies done in Africa shared concerns on the challenges of communicating genetic results to families and therefore hinderance to comprehension (Bukini, Mbekenga, Nkya, Purvis, & Parker, 2020). This concern is shared even in places with established genetic counselling programs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%