A Qualitative study on diverse perspectives and identities of firearm owners

Abstract

ObjectiveResearch surrounding firearm ownership is often contextualised within the perspectives of older white men. We expand this description using the perceptions of a diverse group of firearm-owning stakeholders.MethodsWe conducted semistructured interviews from October 2020 to May 2021 with Colorado/Washington State stakeholders representing (1) firearm ranges/retailers; (2) law enforcement agencies or (3) relevant state/national firearm organisations. Data were analysed using standard qualitative techniques and included 25 participants, representing varied sociocultural groups including racial and ethnic minorities, political minorities and sexual minorities.ResultsParticipants for this analysis were of different self-identified sociocultural groups including racial and ethnic minorities (African American, Hispanic and Asian), political minorities (liberal) and sexual minorities, defined as Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender (LGBT). Perspectives on firearm ownership included an idea of gun culture as a component of (1) personal identity, (2) an expression of full citizenship and (3) necessary for self-protection. A strong subtheme was the intersection of minority group and firearm owner identities, creating a need for divergent social communities because of ideas on traditional gun culture. These communities are a safe place for individuals belonging to minority groups to escape negative external and internal group associations with firearms.ConclusionPerspectives on firearms and firearm ownership in the secondary analysis were heterogeneous and related to personal experiences, external and internal group pressures that influence individual behaviour. Understanding the breadth of perspectives on firearm ownership is imperative to engaging individuals for risk reduction. This study adds to the literature by expanding an understanding of the motivation for firearm ownership among diverse communities.

Stakeholder perceptions of lethal means safety counseling: A qualitative systematic review

“…Fourth, only one theme was relevant to the CFIR domain of Process of Implementation and two themes were relevant to Inner Setting, highlighting the limited research relevant to these areas. Notably, the majority of papers included in our review (15 out of 19) were published since 2019, consistent with an uptick in firearm-related research funding and publication nationally (63) and suggesting that some of the gaps in the literature may soon be addressed [e.g., (64)].…”

Creation of online maps for voluntary out-of-home firearm storage: Experiences and opportunities

“…Some sites created statewide maps, while others focused on particular areas. For programs with limited funding or staffing, another approach may be including only retailers/ranges (not LEAs) to decrease the work of map creation while still optimizing public service, as some firearm owners may not trust LEAs ( Betz et al, 2022 , Thomas et al, 2022 ).…”

Rural-Urban Variation in the Association of Adolescent Violence and Handgun Carrying in the United States, 2002-2019

“…Due to structural racism, racialized groups experience higher rates of firearm-related harms and may relate to firearms in unique ways. 7 , 47 Therefore, describing the distribution of racial and ethnic groups is relevant for equity-centered interventions to prevent handgun carrying-related harms. To avoid suppressed cells, we used 4 race and ethnicity categories: Hispanic, non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black ), non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White ), and non-Hispanic other race or multiple races (including American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Native Hawaiian, other Pacific Islander, and other; beginning in 2013, Guamanian or Chamorro and Samoan were included).…”

“…Adolescents’ self-reported their sex (male or female) and race and ethnicity with NSDUH-defined options. Due to structural racism, racialized groups experience higher rates of firearm-related harms and may relate to firearms in unique ways . Therefore, describing the distribution of racial and ethnic groups is relevant for equity-centered interventions to prevent handgun carrying-related harms.…”