2013
DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20130628-03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Qualitative Study on the Use of the Care Programme Approach with Individuals with Borderline Personality Disorder: A Service User Perspective

Abstract: A newly developed specialist personality disorder service in the United Kingdom arranged a focus group with seven service users with a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder (BPD) to explore their experiences of the Care Programme Approach (CPA) while under the care of a community mental health team. A thematic analysis generated seven themes. Understanding Borderline Personality Disorder and Understanding Recovery were highlighted as difficulties service users face, with a lack of staff understanding. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An update to our original search was performed in May 2014, which identified a further five papers meeting our inclusion criteria. 134 138 Although all were small studies focused on specific clinical populations, 134 , 136 , 138 or on variants of care planning, 135 , 137 their data corroborated our synthesis, highlighting the following ongoing barriers to service user involvement: ritualised practices; 136 , 138 insufficient information provision; 134 , 135 , 138 lack of service user confidence, 138 or competence; 135 and professional scepticism. 137 Effective involvement will aIways depend on the skills and competencies of the parties involved, and it is arguable whether all service users and carers possess the necessary skills and confidence to work collaboratively with mental health professionals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…An update to our original search was performed in May 2014, which identified a further five papers meeting our inclusion criteria. 134 138 Although all were small studies focused on specific clinical populations, 134 , 136 , 138 or on variants of care planning, 135 , 137 their data corroborated our synthesis, highlighting the following ongoing barriers to service user involvement: ritualised practices; 136 , 138 insufficient information provision; 134 , 135 , 138 lack of service user confidence, 138 or competence; 135 and professional scepticism. 137 Effective involvement will aIways depend on the skills and competencies of the parties involved, and it is arguable whether all service users and carers possess the necessary skills and confidence to work collaboratively with mental health professionals.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similarly the perspectives of mental health clinicians on the recovery journey in BPD were also absent. Misunderstandings surrounding what constitutes as recovery has also been identified as a barrier to clinicians promoting recovery[ 69 ]. Differences in understanding may have detrimental effects on therapeutic alliance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study is somewhat unusual in identifying user‐centred limitations to care planning alongside deficits in the care planning process. We have seen that users are looking to professionals and services to help them navigate well‐known issues around perceived capacity and insight (Rogers & Dunne , Shields et al . ), which have been used to suppress people's involvement previously (Chinman et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where users' views have been explored these have tended to be via small scale, qualitative studies focused on a single facet of the decision‐making process (Goss et al . , Rogers & Dunne ). There thus persists an important knowledge gap between the more nebulous ‘top‐down’ concepts advocated by mental health policy and the power and influence of individual stakeholders in determining exactly what user‐involved care planning should entail.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%