Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Objective: This cross-sectional quantitative study aimed to establish the prevalence, antecedents, and outcomes of workplace bullying among senior medical staff in Africa. It will look at how workplace demands, peer and managerial support and bullying affects personal and professional outcomes.Methods: We used a mixed methods approach with quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews in several African healthcare settings. The prevalence of bullying was measured using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-r), and the level of workplace demands and support for individuals was assessed using the Health and Safety Executive Management Standards Analysis Tool.Findings: The new study found that 38% of senior doctors reported experiencing bullying on a weekly basis and even higher rates in emergency medicine and related specialties. Bullying was significantly associated with high workplace demands and low peer and managerial support. So far-reaching were the ramifications of his bullying that they undermined both individual welfare and organizational efficacy. In other words, 69.6% of responses did not indicate bullying because of alleged reasons of barriers for reporting like fear of retaliation, and lack of trust in management whatsoever.Novelty: This study offers unprecedented insights into a hitherto neglected area workplace bullying in African healthcare. It showcases novel contributing aspects, including workload and support systems, while shedding light on the barriers to reporting, providing a new lens of contention in African contexts.Research Implications: Its findings highlight the importance of schools' implementing interventions to reduce workplace bullying, including promoting supportive infrastructures, managing demands and stressors in the workplace, and creating environments for safe reporting, to protect the well-being of Africa's senior medical professionals.
Objective: This cross-sectional quantitative study aimed to establish the prevalence, antecedents, and outcomes of workplace bullying among senior medical staff in Africa. It will look at how workplace demands, peer and managerial support and bullying affects personal and professional outcomes.Methods: We used a mixed methods approach with quantitative surveys and qualitative interviews in several African healthcare settings. The prevalence of bullying was measured using the Negative Acts Questionnaire (NAQ-r), and the level of workplace demands and support for individuals was assessed using the Health and Safety Executive Management Standards Analysis Tool.Findings: The new study found that 38% of senior doctors reported experiencing bullying on a weekly basis and even higher rates in emergency medicine and related specialties. Bullying was significantly associated with high workplace demands and low peer and managerial support. So far-reaching were the ramifications of his bullying that they undermined both individual welfare and organizational efficacy. In other words, 69.6% of responses did not indicate bullying because of alleged reasons of barriers for reporting like fear of retaliation, and lack of trust in management whatsoever.Novelty: This study offers unprecedented insights into a hitherto neglected area workplace bullying in African healthcare. It showcases novel contributing aspects, including workload and support systems, while shedding light on the barriers to reporting, providing a new lens of contention in African contexts.Research Implications: Its findings highlight the importance of schools' implementing interventions to reduce workplace bullying, including promoting supportive infrastructures, managing demands and stressors in the workplace, and creating environments for safe reporting, to protect the well-being of Africa's senior medical professionals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.