2010
DOI: 10.18848/1447-9494/cgp/v17i05/47024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quality Assessment of Science Instructional Management in Basic Education Schools: An Application of a Value–added Model and Differential Item Functioning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of factor loading of identified factors and their indicators in the growth mindset model imply that all the factors and indicators are important constructs to grow school administrators' positive mindset. Hence, all the key factors and their indicators are fit well with empirical data at a statistically significant level (Tuksino, 2009). In this line of reasoning, researchers concluded all the factors and indicators appear to be consistent with either growth mindset theory (Dweck, 2006) or previous research studies (DeWitt, 2020;Elmore, 2019;Meador, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The results of factor loading of identified factors and their indicators in the growth mindset model imply that all the factors and indicators are important constructs to grow school administrators' positive mindset. Hence, all the key factors and their indicators are fit well with empirical data at a statistically significant level (Tuksino, 2009). In this line of reasoning, researchers concluded all the factors and indicators appear to be consistent with either growth mindset theory (Dweck, 2006) or previous research studies (DeWitt, 2020;Elmore, 2019;Meador, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The significant results of this study are related to the status of the standard factor loading of every factor in the PKM to enhance the effectiveness of the TLM model. These results were supported by Tuksino (2009) who revealed that all the recognized factors and indicators of the measurement model conformed perfectly at a significant level of 0.01 with the empirical data. As a result, researchers concluded that all the 10 vital factors and their 30 indicators are important variables and seem to be in corresponding to both theory and literature review.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The first one is assessing responsibility in educational institutions that can be auditable and the second one is assessing the relative effectiveness of teachers. Some models consider only students' existing knowledge or take other variables such as sex, religion, and economic status into consideration [4], [5], [6], [7]. The TIMSS 2015 assessment results reported Singapore achieved the highest mean score in mathematics (621 points), followed by South Korea (the average score of 606) while Thailand had the average score of 431 which was listed in a low-level group [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%