A quality improvement project for delirium prevention and management over the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network

Abstract

Background Delirium is a common complication of critical illness with a significant impact on patient morbidity and mortality. The Greater Manchester Critical Care Network established the Delirium Reduction Working Group in 2015. This article describes a region-wide delirium improvement project launched by that group. Methods Multiple Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles were undertaken. Cycle 1: April 2015 demonstrated only 48% of patients had a formal delirium screen. Following this a network-wide event took place and the Delirium Standards for the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network were produced. Cycle 2: May 2016 quarterly audits across the network monitored compliance against the agreed standards. Group events involved implementation of a delirium care bundle, sharing best practice, educating staff and providing guidance on the management of delirium. Cycle 3: November 2016 quarterly audit continued and a regional delirium study day was rolled out across the region. Results We have 14 different units across our network, all of which have participated in the audit. The first audit showed a delirium point prevalence of 28%, subsequent point prevalence audits demonstrated rates as low as 13%. There has also been an improvement in the use of delirium screening tools. In the first audit 37% of patients had two delirium screens in 24 h, this has increased to 60% in the latest audit. Improvements were also made in availability of sensory aids and pain assessments. Conclusion The project has demonstrated the feasibility of delivering a coordinated delirium improvement project across multiple critical care units.

POSTOPED: improving surveillance of postoperative delirium in a Scottish tertiary hospital

“…Adaption of delirium education materials to environments other than medical wards has precedent, with a quality improvement project involving the Greater Manchester Critical Care Network showing improvement in the use of screening tools. 22 …”