2008
DOI: 10.1109/cecandeee.2008.134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quality Model for Evaluating Reusability of Services in SOA

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rud et al [13] describe metrics for measuring the granularity of services; Hirzalla et al [14] focus on flexibility. Choi et al [15] describe metrics for the reusability of services. However, their work is only partially applicable for evaluating service designs because the metrics discussed are mostly meant for application on an entire service-oriented architecture with fully implemented services, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rud et al [13] describe metrics for measuring the granularity of services; Hirzalla et al [14] focus on flexibility. Choi et al [15] describe metrics for the reusability of services. However, their work is only partially applicable for evaluating service designs because the metrics discussed are mostly meant for application on an entire service-oriented architecture with fully implemented services, i.e.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, their work does not explicitly describe design attributes that refer to elements of a service design or metrics. Other work emphasizing metrics in the context of service-oriented architecture, as introduced by Perepletchikov et al [10,12], Rud et al [13], Hirzalla et al [14], and Choi et al [15], is only partly applicable for evaluating service designs with respect to service characteristics because some metrics require more information than is actually available during the design phase. In other cases, the relation of the measured design attribute to the desired service characteristics is not apparent, which reduces the motivation to apply this metric.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reusability [7] λ1(S1) = -0.5 * Coupling + 0.61 * ServiceGranularity + 0.61 * Parameter Granularity Medium Adaptability [6] λ2(S1)=NumConsumers Satisfied Variants/ NumTotalApplicableConsumers High Granularity [5] λ3 (S1)= 1/number of "atomic process" in owls file…”
Section: Effective Factors Metric _ Importance Levelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rate of combining threshold would be considered 0. 6 and combining rate of candidate services would be compared to the threshold amount. 4.…”
Section: Proposed Local Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring reusability enables one to analyze the reduction in cost or development time when building any software. Metrics for reusability in object oriented system have been stated by [2][3] [4][5], for component based system have been addressed by [11][14] [15] and similarly for service oriented system [42] [43]. There exists various metrics for measuring reusability of object oriented system and component based system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%