2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.irbm.2011.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantiative approach for the assessment of the pelvic dynamics modeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finite element modelling of pelvic mobility has been investigated by several authors . To build a consistent FE model, three fundamental elements have to be known: the mechanical properties, the geometry and the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finite element modelling of pelvic mobility has been investigated by several authors . To build a consistent FE model, three fundamental elements have to be known: the mechanical properties, the geometry and the boundary conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a more mechanical context, finite element (FE) modelling has been proposed to better understand the role of suspension structures such as ligaments on pelvic mobility and the physiopathology of prolapses, and to predict the motion of an organ. In this context, the use of a FE modelling strategy would help define the relative importance of each suspension structure more accurately and better understand the influence of the pathology on mobility, but this requires experimental data for validation of the model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomechanical numerical simulation could offer indirect characterization of pelvic organs mechanical impairment and guide surgical intervention, anticipating patients recovery. Based on shape descriptors and anatomical references approximation, comparison criteria between simulation sequence and 2D midsagittal dynamic MRI of a same patient was proposed to validate and enhance a physical model [17]. 2D dynamic data are not sufficient to depict realistic 3D biomechanical models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%