2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2016.09.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantification method for shale fracability based on analytic hierarchy process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the Analytic Hierarchy Process is considered to be a subjective weighting approach, it should be noted that only evaluating a pairwise comparison matrix needs subjective analysis according to experience, 28 and the matrix tends to be achieved through comparison between two parameters in the same level with one another. 28 indicate the calculation results pass a consistency check of rationality and reliability ( Table 5).…”
Section: Index Weight Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the Analytic Hierarchy Process is considered to be a subjective weighting approach, it should be noted that only evaluating a pairwise comparison matrix needs subjective analysis according to experience, 28 and the matrix tends to be achieved through comparison between two parameters in the same level with one another. 28 indicate the calculation results pass a consistency check of rationality and reliability ( Table 5).…”
Section: Index Weight Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicators with weight values exceeding 0.03 include R o , organic matter type, burial depth, porosity, structural characteristics, fracture development, permeability, reservoir pressure, and mineral composition; in contrast, other factors, for example, the economic conditions, have lower weight values. 28 However, EWM, EDM, and GRA are based on objective data, and the calculation of the relevant parameters depends little on the subjective or sensory components. However, the results using λ GRA that show poor importance differentiation of each parameter are almost around the average of 0.004, and the gas content as the mother factor has the largest weight value.…”
Section: Index Weight Determinationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various brittleness evaluation equations were established, and the most popular among them was proposed by Rickman et al 7 According to his viewpoint, brittleness combines the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio and can represent the level of fracability. Sui et al 19 creatively used analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method to establish a quantification model for fracability evaluation of shale gas reservoirs. The fracability level increases with increased content of brittle minerals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, inspired by the study in the reference, 19 the AHP was used to establish a comprehensive fracability evaluation model for naturally fractured sandstone reservoir. However, some important factors such as natural fracture was not included, which may lead to bias for fracability evaluation of naturally fractured reservoirs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%