2014
DOI: 10.1177/0022219414556771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantile Regression Approach to Understanding the Relations Among Morphological Awareness, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in Adult Basic Education Students

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to investigate the joint and unique contributions of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge at five reading comprehension levels in Adult Basic Education (ABE) students. We introduce the statistical technique of multiple quantile regression, which enabled us to assess the predictive utility of morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge at multiple points (quantiles) along the continuous distribution of reading comprehension. To demonstrate the efficacy of our multi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Older children construe a speaker's use of an indirect evidential such as "Someone told me [x]," as a sign that the speaker is distancing herself from the source and does not necessarily agree with the source. This would be consistent with general developments in children's theory of mind, particularly in their understanding that speakers may intentionally say things that contradict their beliefs (e.g., Ackerman, 1983;Filippova & Astington, 2008;Peterson et al, 2012). However, different evidentials have been used across these studies (grammaticalized vs. lexicalized) and may be interpreted differently by children; thus, comparisons across studies are speculative pending further research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Older children construe a speaker's use of an indirect evidential such as "Someone told me [x]," as a sign that the speaker is distancing herself from the source and does not necessarily agree with the source. This would be consistent with general developments in children's theory of mind, particularly in their understanding that speakers may intentionally say things that contradict their beliefs (e.g., Ackerman, 1983;Filippova & Astington, 2008;Peterson et al, 2012). However, different evidentials have been used across these studies (grammaticalized vs. lexicalized) and may be interpreted differently by children; thus, comparisons across studies are speculative pending further research.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…."). As well, we speculate that these age trends partly reflect a developing understanding that speakers may intentionally say things that contradict what they think (Ackerman, 1983;Filippova & Astington, 2008;Peterson, Wellman, & Slaughter, 2012). This understanding may lead children to interpret certain second-hand evidentials (e.g., "Someone told me") as markers of implicit disagreement and attempts by the informant to distance herself from the original source ("She thinks differently from what he said").…”
mentioning
confidence: 83%
“…A battery of seven experimental morphological awareness measures and two norm‐referenced vocabulary measures were administered (as also described in Tighe & Schatschneider, ). We included multiple measures of each construct to permit analyses based on latent variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the education sciences, quantile regression has been used to understand differential associations between fluency and reading comprehension skills (Catts, Petscher, Schatschneider, Bridges, & Mendoza, ; Petscher & Kim, ), math achievement and socioeconomic status (Petscher & Logan, ), math language and math development (Purpura & Logan, ), and morphological awareness and vocabulary with reading comprehension (Tighe & Schatschneider, ). In the present study, the factors from the confirmatory factor analyses were used to test the extent to which the relations between reading and science varied for individuals with low to high science scores.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%