2011 IEEE International Parallel &Amp; Distributed Processing Symposium 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ipdps.2011.84
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Analysis of OS Noise

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, LAMMPS scales very well for the size of system under study. Finally and most importantly, LAMMPS is widely regarded as an application that is resistant to external interference [24]. Therefore, LAMMPS represents a good challenge when testing for a performance degradation due to external perturbations like RDMA traffic.…”
Section: Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, LAMMPS scales very well for the size of system under study. Finally and most importantly, LAMMPS is widely regarded as an application that is resistant to external interference [24]. Therefore, LAMMPS represents a good challenge when testing for a performance degradation due to external perturbations like RDMA traffic.…”
Section: Multimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HPC infrastructures frequently get their performance severely degraded by system noise or jitter, which is caused by factors like OS activity, network sharing e ects or other phenomena [24]. Although the e ects of system jitter may be negligible as long as they are kept at the local scale, parallel operations like reductions or synchronizations are known to strongly amplify its e ects by propagating jitter across the whole parallel system [20].…”
Section: Tolerance To System Noisementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2011 [13], a more quantitative analysis of noise in the Linux OS using OS-level instrumentation focused on recording the frequency and duration of individual noise sources, e.g., page fault, different interrupt types, and process preemption, and visualizing the noise trace data using Paraver [16]. The experiments targeted the Sequoia benchmarks (AMG, IRS, LAMMPS, SPHOT, UMT) [11] to break down the individual sources of OS noise for each benchmark and to identify the noise frequency and period for each source.…”
Section: Operating System Noisementioning
confidence: 99%