1976
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(76)90060-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative analysis of surface segregation and in-depth profile of copper-nickel alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
20
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the contrary, a positive value of a surface segregation energy E on an atomic layer implies that the impurity or solute cannot exist in that layer. Excepting Ni in Pt host, our calculated −0.40 [41] 0.11 [41] −0.13 [41] 0.15 [41] −0.37 [44] 0.233 [48] −0.49 [45] Y [42,43] Y [46,47] N [49] −0.28 [67] −0.14 [67] 0.12 [67] −0.03 [67] 0.21 [67] −0.01 [41] −0.03 [41] 0.04 [41] 0.01 [41] −0.147 [48] 0.11 [41] 0.11 [41] 0.24 [41] 0.42 [41] N [45] N [50] 0.15 [67] 0.07 [67] 0.35 [67] 0.28 [68] 0.27 [67] −0.07 [41] 0.15 [41] 0.21 [41] 0.38 [41] 0.56 [44] N [46,47] Y [43,51] N [52] N [53] 0.34 [68] −0.04 [67] 0.56 [68] 0.28 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, a positive value of a surface segregation energy E on an atomic layer implies that the impurity or solute cannot exist in that layer. Excepting Ni in Pt host, our calculated −0.40 [41] 0.11 [41] −0.13 [41] 0.15 [41] −0.37 [44] 0.233 [48] −0.49 [45] Y [42,43] Y [46,47] N [49] −0.28 [67] −0.14 [67] 0.12 [67] −0.03 [67] 0.21 [67] −0.01 [41] −0.03 [41] 0.04 [41] 0.01 [41] −0.147 [48] 0.11 [41] 0.11 [41] 0.24 [41] 0.42 [41] N [45] N [50] 0.15 [67] 0.07 [67] 0.35 [67] 0.28 [68] 0.27 [67] −0.07 [41] 0.15 [41] 0.21 [41] 0.38 [41] 0.56 [44] N [46,47] Y [43,51] N [52] N [53] 0.34 [68] −0.04 [67] 0.56 [68] 0.28 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all three cases both the electronic structure of the alloy surface (density of electronic states) and its topography can, and often will, be greatly modified by the mutual concentrations of the constituents. In addition, surface enrichment may occur, whereby the more volatile constituent usually segregates at the surface [73]. Taking an example from sub-category (i), we consider an alloy between Ni and Cu, where Ni is the active' and Cu the inactive' component.…”
Section: Hydrogen Surface Diffusion and Transfer On Heterogeneous Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On heterogeneous catalyst materials consisting of small Ni, Ru, Pd, Ir or Pt clusters dispersed on a silica, alumina, titania, zirconia or carbon support, H spillover has frequently been reported [72,[100][101][102][103]. It should be noted here that the literature available for the issue "spill-over of hydrogen" certainly fills several book shelves [100], and there are very important novel aspects of energy technology where the transfer of hydrogen, e.g., from transition metal nanoparticles to carbon nanotubes is considered in order to develop new materials (carbon-metal composites) for hydrogen storage and fuel cell applications [72,73,103]. For alloys or bimetallic systems, fewer reports exist in favor of H spill-over.…”
Section: Hydrogen Surface Diffusion and Transfer On Heterogeneous Metmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In alloys, large differences in the surface energies of the constituents causes surface segregation, such as in Ni-Cu. 16) Besides the surface energy, the surface composition depends on the conditions used in liquidphase synthesis owing to the different reduction processes of the constituents. For example, in noble-metal core-shell nanoparticles, the tendency to form shells follows the trend Rh > Pd > Pt > Au, 17) but the surface energies follow the trend Rh > Pt > Pd > Au.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%