2016
DOI: 10.3390/f7010023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Assessment of Forest Cover Change in the Moulouya River Watershed (Morocco) by the Integration of a Subpixel-Based and Object-Based Analysis of Landsat Data

Abstract: A quantitative assessment of forest cover change in the Moulouya River watershed (Morocco) was carried out by means of an innovative approach from atmospherically corrected reflectance Landsat images corresponding to 1984 (Landsat 5 Thematic Mapper) and 2013 (Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager). An object-based image analysis (OBIA) was undertaken to classify segmented objects as forested or non-forested within the 2013 Landsat orthomosaic. A Random Forest classifier was applied to a set of training data based … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
9
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholds of non-forest classes from the forest class were determined by matching their values within the derived object features. The objects that had maximum difference values less than 0.52 were classified as water, residential areas, and grasslands; objects that had green vegetation index (GVI) [92] values that were negative and standard deviations derived from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) less than 21 were classified as dry-farming; the objects that had enhanced vegetation index2 [93] values higher than 0.98 and entropy derived from the GLCM less than 7 were classified as irrigated-farming; and the remaining unclassified objects were classified as forest [82]. The accuracy of the classifications was validated using the provided ground truth samples and confusion matrix [94], as shown in Table A1.…”
Section: Conditioning and Triggering Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thresholds of non-forest classes from the forest class were determined by matching their values within the derived object features. The objects that had maximum difference values less than 0.52 were classified as water, residential areas, and grasslands; objects that had green vegetation index (GVI) [92] values that were negative and standard deviations derived from the gray-level co-occurrence matrix (GLCM) less than 21 were classified as dry-farming; the objects that had enhanced vegetation index2 [93] values higher than 0.98 and entropy derived from the GLCM less than 7 were classified as irrigated-farming; and the remaining unclassified objects were classified as forest [82]. The accuracy of the classifications was validated using the provided ground truth samples and confusion matrix [94], as shown in Table A1.…”
Section: Conditioning and Triggering Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other aspects have focused on exploring proposals to evaluate the accuracy and precision of photogrammetric mappings, such as through the variation of the number of control points [18] or the use of sub-pixel technology [19], also presenting the development of automatic procedures that take advantage of satellite images to draw building plans [20]. Both this technology and other surveying procedures, such as laser and LIDAR (Laser Imaging Detection and Ranging) scanners, have brought enormous advances in heritage conservation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Monitoring the trends to which ecosystem is changing by the use of indicators such as land cover and socio-demographic information will be essential in order to make proper planning for sustainable ecosystem management. Nowadays, the advancement of geospatial technology such as RS and geographic information system (GIS) present the best efficient tool for analyzing land cover trends as demonstrated by many researchers [5,6,7,8]. Geospatial technologies in addition to conventional inventories can facilitate quantitative evaluation and provide a baseline for monitoring the extent, impacts and trend of LCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%