1998
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.38.1270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Characterization of Austenite Microstructure after Deformation in Nonrecrystallization Region and Its Influence on Ferrite Microstructure after Transformation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a result, the austenite grains became somewhat large (2 À30 mm), as shown in Fig. 3b, and this finally resulted in somewhat large ferrite grains ( $ 7 mm) ( Table 1); ferrite grain size is closely related to austenite grain size because the austenite grain boundaries serve as the nucleation sites for g-a transformation during the coiling process [20][21][22][23]. On the other hand, for the rolling condition of the FRT 880 1C which corresponds to the rolling at g non-recrystallization region, the deformation applied during the rolling process cannot be accommodated completely unlike the case of FRT 1050 1C in which the deformation applied can be accommodated via the recrystallization of austenite grains.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…As a result, the austenite grains became somewhat large (2 À30 mm), as shown in Fig. 3b, and this finally resulted in somewhat large ferrite grains ( $ 7 mm) ( Table 1); ferrite grain size is closely related to austenite grain size because the austenite grain boundaries serve as the nucleation sites for g-a transformation during the coiling process [20][21][22][23]. On the other hand, for the rolling condition of the FRT 880 1C which corresponds to the rolling at g non-recrystallization region, the deformation applied during the rolling process cannot be accommodated completely unlike the case of FRT 1050 1C in which the deformation applied can be accommodated via the recrystallization of austenite grains.…”
Section: Microstructurementioning
confidence: 89%
“…[1] After austenite deformation below the T 5pct , several changes in austenite state are made, including grain shape, texture, density of substructures, annealing twin boundaries (changed into normal high-angle grain boundaries (HAGBs) during deformation), and bulging of austenite grain boundaries. [2] This austenite conditioning strongly affects the transformed microstructure and, hence, the final mechanical properties. [3,4] For thermomechanically processed microalloyed steels, air cooling often leads to a ferrite-pearlite microstructure with mechanical properties commonly below the X-70 grade.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hard martensite phase under straining can stimulate the formation of new mobile dislocations in a soft ferrite matrix and, by means of this, decrease the yield strength. [28] Furthermore, the martensite was not uniformly distributed within the ferrite, so giving rise to a gradual deviation from elastic deformation. Hence, it is proposed that all these features decrease the yield strength.…”
Section: B Microstructure-property Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%