2013
DOI: 10.1111/epp.12086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative interpretation of the entry section of the EPPO decision‐support scheme for pest risk analysis

Abstract: The development of methods to combine components of risk and their associated uncertainty in Pest Risk Analysis (PRA) has received attention in a number of recent European projects. Many of the risk components distinguished in the EPPO Decision support scheme (DSS) for PRA are usually difficult to quantify but when there is detailed knowledge of the pest and pathway, quantification may be possible to a limited extent for the pest entry section of the scheme. The European Food Safety Authority has recently comm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work to improve European decision‐support schemes in PRA––“Prima phacie” and “PRATIQUE”––used networks analogous to Bayesian networks but with parameterization made possible by offering users choices from restricted sets of probability distributions that had direct correspondence to an existing risk‐rating system with which PRA practitioners were already familiar. In these projects, parameterization was also made easier by designing the network such that each child node had no more than two parents, so keeping the CPTs more manageable . Here also, by restricting the CPTs defining the child nodes to two parents and by using consistent assumptions throughout, the model can be described by a small set of tables or matrices; only four of these are used in the model (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work to improve European decision‐support schemes in PRA––“Prima phacie” and “PRATIQUE”––used networks analogous to Bayesian networks but with parameterization made possible by offering users choices from restricted sets of probability distributions that had direct correspondence to an existing risk‐rating system with which PRA practitioners were already familiar. In these projects, parameterization was also made easier by designing the network such that each child node had no more than two parents, so keeping the CPTs more manageable . Here also, by restricting the CPTs defining the child nodes to two parents and by using consistent assumptions throughout, the model can be described by a small set of tables or matrices; only four of these are used in the model (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysing pest interceptions on pathways can identify routes for pest entry that may require risk management measures to mitigate the likelihood of pest entry (MacLeod, ). Pest risks are rarely fully evaluated quantitatively, although when there is detailed knowledge of the pest and pathway quantification of the risk of entry may be possible (Holt et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Analysing pest interceptions on pathways can identify routes for pest entry that may require risk management measures to mitigate the likelihood of pest entry (MacLeod, 2015). Pest risks are rarely fully evaluated quantitatively, although when there is detailed knowledge of the pest and pathway quantification of the risk of entry may be possible (Holt et al, 2014). This paper describes the development of a quantitative pathway model examining the likelihood of pest arrival and transfer to a host via trade in specific host commodities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%