2013
DOI: 10.3109/00016357.2013.826383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative method for comparing human dentition with tooth marks using three-dimensional technology and geometric morphometric analysis

Abstract: This quantitative method has sufficient discriminative power to be utilized in forensic cases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(3 M ESPE St. Paul, MN) XCAD 3D® (XCADCAM Technology®, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) XCAD 3D® (XCADCAM Technology®, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) Software packages Meshlab V1.3.2, Pisa, Italy) Geomagic Control (Morrisville, NC) Geomagic Studio® (3D Systems®, Rock Hill, SC, USA) software package (GS), S.® 8.0 (Tibco®, Palo Alto, California, USA) Geomagic Studio® (3D Systems®, Rock Hill, SC, USA) software package (GS), S.® 8.0 (Tibco®, Palo Alto, California, USA) Studies on suitability of different computer-assisted methods for bitemark analyzes are presented in the Table 4 (6 articles) Table 4 Overview of the studies on computer-assisted methods for bitemark analyzes Author Naether et al . [ 10 ] Martin-de-las-Heras et al [ 14 ] Przystańska et al [ 15 ] de Sainte Croix et al [ 16 ] Ramos et al [ 24 ] Molina et al [ 26 ] Aim of the study Evaluate the identification of bite marks in different kinds of food and investigated whether the identification of the biter is still possible, after food has been lying around for some time Develop a quantitative method to compare 3D overlays from dental casts with experimental bitemarks by using geometric morphometric analysis Investigate the possibility of identifying a biter using 2D and 3D analysis of experimental bite marks Investigate if a 3D imaging technique, creating a 3D time-lapse image of a bite mark can provide context to the nature and location of injury Can BitePrint calculate the same parameters for the biting edges generated from 3D images of dental casts? Determine dental parameters that characterize human bite marks and dentitions for biter identification using semiautomatized technology The sample size
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(3 M ESPE St. Paul, MN) XCAD 3D® (XCADCAM Technology®, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) XCAD 3D® (XCADCAM Technology®, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil) Software packages Meshlab V1.3.2, Pisa, Italy) Geomagic Control (Morrisville, NC) Geomagic Studio® (3D Systems®, Rock Hill, SC, USA) software package (GS), S.® 8.0 (Tibco®, Palo Alto, California, USA) Geomagic Studio® (3D Systems®, Rock Hill, SC, USA) software package (GS), S.® 8.0 (Tibco®, Palo Alto, California, USA) Studies on suitability of different computer-assisted methods for bitemark analyzes are presented in the Table 4 (6 articles) Table 4 Overview of the studies on computer-assisted methods for bitemark analyzes Author Naether et al . [ 10 ] Martin-de-las-Heras et al [ 14 ] Przystańska et al [ 15 ] de Sainte Croix et al [ 16 ] Ramos et al [ 24 ] Molina et al [ 26 ] Aim of the study Evaluate the identification of bite marks in different kinds of food and investigated whether the identification of the biter is still possible, after food has been lying around for some time Develop a quantitative method to compare 3D overlays from dental casts with experimental bitemarks by using geometric morphometric analysis Investigate the possibility of identifying a biter using 2D and 3D analysis of experimental bite marks Investigate if a 3D imaging technique, creating a 3D time-lapse image of a bite mark can provide context to the nature and location of injury Can BitePrint calculate the same parameters for the biting edges generated from 3D images of dental casts? Determine dental parameters that characterize human bite marks and dentitions for biter identification using semiautomatized technology The sample size
…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, FO has shown interesting and promising developments, but it is heterogeneous and still far from international standards (Ortiz et al, 2015;Acuña-Méndez et al, 2022;Rodríguez-Niklitschek et al, 2023). Considering that traditional FO analysis may show limitations related to the observer's subjective judgment, and that it is expected that research will progress towards objective assessments through strategies not dependent on morphological, analytical, molecular, automated, and reproducible traits, based on scientific probabilistic studies (Martin-de-Las-Heras et al, 2014;Tejasvi et al, 2021;Bae & Woo, 2022;Mohammad et al, 2022), the following research questions were formulated: What topics did LATAM FO researchers focus on their original research in the last three years? What type of research has been conducted?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bitemark analysis depends on a combination of morphological and positional information. Geometric morphometric analyses of both 2D [ 12 ] and, notably, 3D [ 13 , 14 ] images of dental casts have provided support for the distinctiveness of individual anterior teeth. In recent years, inquiries have arisen regarding the uniqueness of individual dentitions [ 15 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%