1999
DOI: 10.1080/095006999290615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantitative study of the differences in ideas generated by three different opportunities for classroom talk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There is growing evidence that talk in a science classroom is beneficial in a number of ways (e.g. Dawes, 2004;Swain et al, 1999;Rivard & Straw, 2000). Swain et al (1999) show that different opportunities for talk in the chemistry class offered students different benefits.…”
Section: Talk and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There is growing evidence that talk in a science classroom is beneficial in a number of ways (e.g. Dawes, 2004;Swain et al, 1999;Rivard & Straw, 2000). Swain et al (1999) show that different opportunities for talk in the chemistry class offered students different benefits.…”
Section: Talk and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dawes, 2004;Swain et al, 1999;Rivard & Straw, 2000). Swain et al (1999) show that different opportunities for talk in the chemistry class offered students different benefits. Similarly, Rivard and Straw (2000) conclude that talk has impacted their subjects positively in sharing, clarifying, and distributing knowledge among peers.…”
Section: Talk and Identitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Assim, atualmente as interações verbais que se processam nas discussões entre professor-aluno e aluno-aluno têm sido investigadas por um grande número de autores. Em alguns trabalhos se comparam diferentes oportunidades de discussão (Swain et al, 1999); em outros se avaliam as discussões como um instrumento pedagógico (Sprod, 1997).…”
Section: Como Isso Pode Ser Interpretado?unclassified