A Quantitative Synthesis of Eight Decades of Global Multiple Sclerosis Research Using Bibliometrics

Abstract

Bibliometric studies on the field of multiple sclerosis (MS) research are scarce. The aim of this study is to offer an overarching view of the body of knowledge about MS research over eight decades–from 1945 to 2021–by means of a bibliometric analysis. We performed a quantitative analysis of a massive dataset based on Web of Science. The analysis included frequencies, temporal trends, collaboration networks, clusters of research themes, and an in-depth qualitative analysis. A total of 48,356 articles, with 1,766,086 citations were retrieved. Global MS research showed a steady increase with an annual growth rate of 6.4%, with more than half of the scientific production published in the last decade. Published articles came from 98 different countries by 123,569 authors in 3,267 journals, with the United States ranking first in a number of publications (12,770) and citations (610,334). A co-occurrence network analysis formed four main themes of research, covering the pathophysiological mechanisms, neuropsychological symptoms, diagnostic modalities, and treatment of MS. A noticeable increase in research on cognition, depression, and fatigue was observed, highlighting the increased attention to the quality of life of patients with MS. This bibliometric analysis provided a comprehensive overview of the status of global MS research over the past eight decades. These results could provide a better understanding of this field and help identify new directions for future research.

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of macrophages associated with osteoarthritis from 1991 to 2021

“…Recently, bibliometric analysis has been widely adopted to analyze massive scientific research data and identify developing trends ( 15 ). Importantly, it can summarize publication evolution, predict research hotspots, and further evaluate frontiers in specific fields though a citation network ( 16 – 18 ). As far as we know, although related academic researchers have published bibliometric studies of stem cells in OA ( 19 ), no similar analysis about macrophage in OA have as yet been reported.…”

Research hotspots and trends of oculomotor nerve palsy from 2001 to 2021 based on web of science: A bibliometric analysis

“…The prevailing explanation for coiling's ability to reduce or eliminate aneurysmal pulsatility is more beneficial to nerve recovery than surgical clipping that directly separates the oculomotor nerve from the adjacent aneurysm (39,44,45). Citation analysis of articles is likely to be affected by length-time effects (46), so we performed a burst analysis of the co-cited literature to interpret the results. A systematic review and meta-analysis of endovascular coiling and surgical clipping for ONP, published by Cooccurrence and burst analysis of keywords can reveal the hotspot distribution and the evolution of research trends in a field (47).…”

Bibliometric and visualization analysis of stem cell therapy for meniscal regeneration from 2012 to 2022

“…With advances in statistics science, bibliometric analysis has been utilized gradually, analysing current scientific research data and identifying developing trends ( Wu et al, 2022a ; IsmailSaqr, 2022 ). Furthermore, although a visualized network and comprehensive analysis, it is feasible to investigate the publication condition, predict research trends, and thus analyses research hotspots in specific fields ( Zhang et al, 2022 ; Zhao et al, 2022 ).…”