Proceedings of Fall Meeting of the Society of Petroleum Engineers of AIME 1975
DOI: 10.2523/5513-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Technique for Determining Injectivity Profiles Using Radioactive Tracers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the velocity 512 calculated is the average velocity, the volumetric flow rate is given by (2) At where A is the cross-sectional area between the logging sonde and the pipe wall, LlL is the detector spacing, and At is the measured transit time. Often, the transit time measured from a velocity shot log is the time between the arrival of the leading edge of the tracer slug at the detectors.…”
Section: Velocity Shot Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the velocity 512 calculated is the average velocity, the volumetric flow rate is given by (2) At where A is the cross-sectional area between the logging sonde and the pipe wall, LlL is the detector spacing, and At is the measured transit time. Often, the transit time measured from a velocity shot log is the time between the arrival of the leading edge of the tracer slug at the detectors.…”
Section: Velocity Shot Methodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will not consider errors caused by the gamma ray measurement itself, though these can be significant, as shown by Wiley and Cocanower. 2 The primary drawback to the tracer loss method is its limited depth resolution. As Lichtenberger 1 demonstrates, the tracer loss analysis tends to "smear" locations of fluid exit over larger distances than actually may be occurring because the tracer slug moves a significant distance between measurement locations because of physical constraints and because the measured slug is often opposite zones of fluid loss.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%