1955
DOI: 10.1021/ja01616a035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Quantitative Treatment of Isomer Distribution in Aromatic Electrophilic Substitution1,2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

1964
1964
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The E 5 values of compounds 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 20, 23-25, 27, and 30 were converted from the potential values at pH 7 (E 7 ) or other pH (Steenken & Neta, 1982;Lind et al, 1990;Jovanovic et al, 1991) as described by Jovanovic et al (1991). The E 5 values of compounds 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 11, 21, and 22 were converted from E 7 values which were estimated by the correlation of E 7 ) 0.95 + 0.31σ + (Jovanovic et al, 1991) and the published σ + values (McGary et al, 1955) for the substituents involved. An E 5 (32) of 0.9 V was estimated from E 5 (8) ) 2 ) of 0.58 V and E 5 (4-NH 2 -C 6 H 5 OH) of 0.53 V were converted from the values of Steenken and Heta (1982).…”
Section: T H I S C O N T E N T Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The E 5 values of compounds 1, 3, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 20, 23-25, 27, and 30 were converted from the potential values at pH 7 (E 7 ) or other pH (Steenken & Neta, 1982;Lind et al, 1990;Jovanovic et al, 1991) as described by Jovanovic et al (1991). The E 5 values of compounds 2, 4, 5, 7, 9, 12, 11, 21, and 22 were converted from E 7 values which were estimated by the correlation of E 7 ) 0.95 + 0.31σ + (Jovanovic et al, 1991) and the published σ + values (McGary et al, 1955) for the substituents involved. An E 5 (32) of 0.9 V was estimated from E 5 (8) ) 2 ) of 0.58 V and E 5 (4-NH 2 -C 6 H 5 OH) of 0.53 V were converted from the values of Steenken and Heta (1982).…”
Section: T H I S C O N T E N T Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of the Hammett a and the Brown v+ substituent constants in the investigation of structure-reactivity relationships is well established (1). In their studies on electrophilic aromatic substitution, Brown and coworkers (2) recognized that the original Hammett o constants, derived from the ionization of substituted benzoic acids, required modification to allow for the different electron demand situations at the reaction site. Thus Brown and Okamoto (3) estimated the electrophilic substituent constants v+ from the solvolysis of substituted tert-cumyl chlorides in aqueous acetone.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We now turn to a more quantitative analysis of the bromination kinetics. In the past, several research groups studied the bromination of styrene (or styrene-like monomers) as well as polystyrene under various conditions. , ,− For instance, Robertson et al reported that the bromination of mesitylene in acetic acid follows a second-order kinetics at low bromine concentrations (10 −2 −10 −3 M). Andrews , and Wright groups argued that bromination substitution follows a combined first-order (in bromine) and second-order (in bromine) reaction kinetics. R = d [ Br 2 ] d t = k 1 [ ArH ] [ Br 2 ] + k 2 [ ArH ] [ Br 2 ] 2 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the past, several research groups studied the bromination of styrene (or styrene-like monomers) as well as polystyrene under various conditions. [27][28][29][30][32][33][34][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] For instance, Robertson et al reported that the bromination of mesitylene in acetic acid follows a second-order kinetics at low bromine concentrations (10 -2 -10 -3 M). [73][74][75] Andrews 76,77 and Wright groups 31 argued that bromination substitution follows a From their data it appears that the second-order kinetics in bromine is most dominant because k 1 /k 2 , 1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%