2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10586-022-03740-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A quantum inspired hybrid SSA–GWO algorithm for SLA based task scheduling to improve QoS parameter in cloud computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The designed DSA is also can be used to optimize the hyper-parameters of the deep learning models for the image classification. The feature selection problem and node location of the WSN also can be applied by the proposed inspired algorithm, which is considered the quantum theory [74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The designed DSA is also can be used to optimize the hyper-parameters of the deep learning models for the image classification. The feature selection problem and node location of the WSN also can be applied by the proposed inspired algorithm, which is considered the quantum theory [74].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GSAGA [28] combined GA with Gravitational Search Algorithm (GSA) to improve the resource cost for processing tasks in a cloud. QSSGWA [29] used quantum operator to improve the population initialization, and combined Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) with Grey Wolf Optimizer (GWO), which applied position update strategies of SSA and GWO for the first and second half of the population, respectively. To optimize makespan, Cheikh et al [30] proposed a hybrid heuristic scheduling algorithm by combining PSO and Extremal Optimization (EO), which used PSO to provide the initial solution for EO.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Technique Used Addressed Parameters [7] APSO Makespan, throughput [8] LJ-PSO, M-PSO makespan, total execution time, degree of imbalance [9] GAGELS makespan, resource utilization [10] MPSO Makespan, resource utilization [11] IT2FCM Data movements, data placement, makespan [12] PSO-RDAL Response time, task deadline, penalty cost [13] EPSOCHO Makespan, processing cost, resource utilization [14] GSOS Makespan, cost [15] AINN-BPSO makespan, cost, degree of imbalance [16] QPSO Scheduling efficiency [17] MVO-GA Task transfer time [18] NSGAIII runtime, cost, power consumption [19] Hybrid Lion-GA Load balancing [20] GSAGA Makespan [21] GBO Makespan, accuracy of scheduling [22] HWOA-MBA Makespan, cost [23] IWHOLF-TSC Makespan, cost [24] HWACOA Makespan, cost ELHHO Schedule length, execution cost, resource utilization [28] RATSA Failure rate [29] SOATS Cost, energy consumption [30] HunterPlus Energy consumption, job completion rate [31] IQSSA QOS parameters [32] RAO Makespan [33] HFSGA Makespan, cost [34] DRL Makespan, throughput [35] IMOMVO Execution time, throughput [36] HBSFD Task processing time, turnaround time [37] Wale Disk space [38] Docker Containers Disk space…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the above equation, Y, Z are calculated in Equations ( 26) and ( 27) respectively. For hard besiege with constructive or incremental steps, updation is performed by using the following Equation (31):…”
Section: Fault-tolerant Trust-aware Task Scheduler (Fttats) Using Har...mentioning
confidence: 99%