A quasi-experiment assessing the six-months effects of a nurse care coordination program on patient care experiences and clinician teamwork in community health centers

Abstract

Background: Recognition that coordination among healthcare providers is associated with better quality of care and lower costs has increased interest in interventions designed to improve care coordination. One intervention is to add care coordination to nurses' role in a formal way. Little is known about effects of this approach, which tends to be pursued by small organizations and those in lower-resource settings. We assessed effects of this approach on care experiences of high-risk patients (those most in need of care coordination) and clinician teamwork during the first 6 months of use. Methods: We conducted a quasi-experimental study using a clustered, controlled pre-post design. Changes in staff and patient experiences at six community health center practice locations that introduced the added-role approach for high-risk patients were compared to changes in six locations without the program in the same health system. In the pre-period (6 months before intervention training) and post-period (about 6 months after intervention launch, following 3 months of training), we surveyed clinical staff (N = 171) and program-qualifying patients (3007 preperiod; 2101 post-period, including 113 who were enrolled during the program's first 6 months). Difference-indifferences models examined study outcomes: patient reports about care experiences and clinician-reported teamwork. We assessed frequency of patient office visits to validate access and implementation, and contextual factors (training, resources, and compatibility with other work) that might explain results. Results: Patient care experiences across all high-risk patients did not improve significantly (p > 0.05). They improved somewhat for program enrollees, 5% above baseline reports (p = 0.07). Staff-perceived teamwork did not change significantly (p = 0.12). Office visits increased significantly for enrolled patients (p < 0.001), affirming program implementation (greater accessing of care). Contextual factors were not reported as problematic, except that 41% of nurses reported incompatibility between care coordination and other job demands. Over 75% of nurses reported adequate training and resources. Conclusions: There were some positive effects of adding care coordination to nurses' role within 6 months of implementation, suggesting value in this improvement strategy. Addressing compatibility between coordination and other job demands is important when implementing this approach to coordination.

Assessment Of Health Related Quality Of Life Among Patients With Multiple Sclerosis At Minia University Hospital

“…As a non-specialist in MS, the community nurse should discuss a diagnosis of relapse with a specialist MS practitioner to plan the appropriate intervention. (Nembhard et al, 2020)…”

Work team identification associated with less stress and burnout among front-line emergency department staff amid the COVID-19 pandemic

“…Surveys consisted of questions from previously published validated scales gauging burnout, 9 stress 10 and work team identification 11 (see online supplemental appendix for survey items). Because of the time pressure facing ED healthcare workers, we tailored survey length and language to avoid any interruption in workflow.…”

How responding in Spanish affects CAHPS results

“…The data for this study were collected as part of a larger evaluation of a care coordination program in a group of community health centers [23]. The study selected a stratified random sample of adults (18 years of age or older).…”

“…One goal of the survey was to collect data about patient experience in a program emphasizing coordinated care, as in the model of a Patient-Centered Medical Home [23]. The instrument that was used was the standard Clinician & Group CAHPS survey (3.0) [25,26] with added questions about care coordination [27].…”