method for the detection and estimation of malaria parasites in blood samples using flow cytometry is presented. In a single-step procedure 50 ~1 of blood sample was collected in 1 ml of lysis solution containing formaldehyde, causing red blood cells to lyse while parasites and white blood cells are preserved. Thus prepared, samples could be transported and remained stored in lysis solution until flow cytometric analysis was performed. The cells were stained for DNA with the fluorescent dye Hoechst 33258 and subsequently analyzed by a FACStar flow cytometer. Parasites and white blood cells were distinguished and counted based on blue Hoechst fluorescence and forward scattering. Since red blood cells were lysed, parasite numbers were given related to the number of white blood cells similar to what is done in microscopic examination of thick blood smears. In dilution experiments with animal and human material, parasite counts by flow cytometry correlated very well with the theoretically calculated numbers (regression coefficients of > 0.94). In human material parasitemias of -0.005% were detected. In a pilot study, 700 samples were collected in Thailand and screened by microscopic examination of thick smears and by flow cytometry; 29 were found positive by combining both methods, 2 were missed by flow cytometry, and 20 were missed by microscopists in the field. After microscopic reexamination in the central laboratory, 15 of these 20 were found positive, 5 remained unconfirmed. Key terms: Plasmodium, Hoechst 33258, epidemiological surveysThe slow progress in the development of antimalarial vaccines and the rapidly spreading resistance to commonly used and newly developed drugs reemphasize the need to control malaria at the level of primary health care. Efficient control of malaria requires sensitive and quantitative techniques for the screening of relatively large numbers of people for the presence of malaria parasites. Epidemiological studies covering large areas are currently being performed to monitor the spread of drug resistance, or for the follow-up of drug trials and in the future to follow up vaccine campaigns. At a higher level of health services, accurate and objective parasite counts are needed to carefully monitor malaria infection in the follow-up of treatment of, for instance, drug-resistant parasites. However, the required sensitive detection of malaria parasites especially in large numbers of blood samples still poses problems (22).In the last few years, alternatives to microscopic detection of malaria parasites in thick or thin blood smears have been investigated, such as immunological methods to demonstrate antibodies or antigens (1,17,18), detection of parasites by fluorescence microscopy (24,25), and the use of malaria-specific radioactively labeled DNA and RNA probes (4). Microscopy is still widely considered to be the gold standard when comparing alternative methods, but its performance is highly influenced by the local circumstances and working conditions and on the availability of expertise...