1987
DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.1987.37.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Radioimmunoassay for the Diagnosis of Malaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At a higher level of health services, accurate and objective parasite counts are needed to carefully monitor malaria infection in the follow-up of treatment of, for instance, drug-resistant parasites. However, the required sensitive detection of malaria parasites especially in large numbers of blood samples still poses problems (22).In the last few years, alternatives to microscopic detection of malaria parasites in thick or thin blood smears have been investigated, such as immunological methods to demonstrate antibodies or antigens (1,17,18), detection of parasites by fluorescence micros copy (24,25), and the use of malaria-specific radioactively labeled DNA and RNA probes (4). Microscopy is still widely considered to be the gold standard when comparing alternative methods, but its performance is highly influenced by the local circumstances and working conditions and on the availability of expertise, 'This research was financed in part by the Netherlands' Ministry for Development Co-operation (project ID.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…At a higher level of health services, accurate and objective parasite counts are needed to carefully monitor malaria infection in the follow-up of treatment of, for instance, drug-resistant parasites. However, the required sensitive detection of malaria parasites especially in large numbers of blood samples still poses problems (22).In the last few years, alternatives to microscopic detection of malaria parasites in thick or thin blood smears have been investigated, such as immunological methods to demonstrate antibodies or antigens (1,17,18), detection of parasites by fluorescence micros copy (24,25), and the use of malaria-specific radioactively labeled DNA and RNA probes (4). Microscopy is still widely considered to be the gold standard when comparing alternative methods, but its performance is highly influenced by the local circumstances and working conditions and on the availability of expertise, 'This research was financed in part by the Netherlands' Ministry for Development Co-operation (project ID.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, alternatives to microscopic detection of malaria parasites in thick or thin blood smears have been investigated, such as immunological methods to demonstrate antibodies or antigens (1,17,18), detection of parasites by fluorescence microscopy (24,25), and the use of malaria-specific radioactively labeled DNA and RNA probes (4). Microscopy is still widely considered to be the gold standard when comparing alternative methods, but its performance is highly influenced by the local circumstances and working conditions and on the availability of expertise, ' which is especially a problem in the field (2,3).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several promising approaches to the development of improved malaria diagnosis are under evaluation, including the quantitative buffy coat procedure (15), use of antigen-targeted antibodies (1), and oligonucleotide hybridization which targets repetitive DNA (4) or rRNA (16). We have previously demonstrated the feasibility of using synthetic DNA (9, 10,12) and enzyme-linked synthetic DNA (7,11,13) to detect repetitive DNA nonisotopically.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hutchinson et al developed a simplified radioimmunoassay for diagnostic serology [15]. Later this technique was constantly used for the diagnosis of malaria [16], congenital adrenal hyperplasia [17] endocrine tumors of pancreas [18]. Lately, emergence of fluorescent immunocapture techniques with parallel sensitivity and safety superposed the radioimmunoassays.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%