2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejc.2019.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Ramsey theorem for multiposets

Abstract: In the parlance of relational structures, the Finite Ramsey Theorem states that the class of all finite chains has the Ramsey property. A classical result from the 1980's claims that the class of all finite posets with a linear extension has the Ramsey property. In 2010 Sokić proved that the class of all finite structures consisting of several linear orders has the Ramsey property. This was followed by a 2017 result of Solecki and Zhao that the class of all finite posets with several linear extensions has the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, superposing the linear order with the universal homogeneous structure in language with one unary relation it follows that the homogeneous dense local order has big Ramsey degrees (as shown by Laflamme, Nguyen Van Thé and Sauer [LNVTS10]). Superposing multiple linear and partial orders leads to big Ramsey equivalents of results of Sokić [Sok13], Solecki and Zhao [SZ17], and Draganić and Mašulović [DM19]. 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Similarly, superposing the linear order with the universal homogeneous structure in language with one unary relation it follows that the homogeneous dense local order has big Ramsey degrees (as shown by Laflamme, Nguyen Van Thé and Sauer [LNVTS10]). Superposing multiple linear and partial orders leads to big Ramsey equivalents of results of Sokić [Sok13], Solecki and Zhao [SZ17], and Draganić and Mašulović [DM19]. 7.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…, n} both P T and − → P T are Fraïssé ages. It was shown in [3] that the class − → P fin T has the Ramsey property, while Corollary 4.2 establishes the ordering property for the class. The rest is now an immediate consequence of Theorem 4.4.…”
Section: If (Cmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…, n}. It was shown in [3] that the class − → P fin T has the Ramsey property, so Theorem 4.1 implies that it suffices to show that the class − → P T has the (W △C). But this is straightforward since for any Σ ⊆ S 2 ( − → P fin T ) we can always take τ = ({0, 1}, =, .…”
Section: If (Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Almost any reasonable class of finite relational structures has the Ramsey property or a Ramsey expansion, usually by an appropriate choice of linear orders. For example, finite graphs expanded with arbitrary linear orders have the Ramsey property [31,32]; the same holds for finite hypergraphs [31,32] and finite metric spaces [30]; finite posets expanded with linear orders that extend the partial order have the Ramsey property [39,11]; the same holds for multiposets -structures with several partial orders forming a partial order [9]; finite equivalence relations with linear orders where equivalence classes are convex have the Ramsey property [18]; the same holds for finite ultrametric spaces with linear orders where balls are convex [34,35]; and the list goes on and on. One of the most prominent general results in this direction is the Nešetřil-Rödl Theorem:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%