2018 52nd Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ciss.2018.8362254
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A random-signal approach to robust radar detection

Abstract: Abstract-The paper presents a novel family of robust radar receivers for the problem of detecting the possible presence of a coherent return from a given cell under test. The idea is to introduce a random signal in addition to the nominal steering vector, with a given structure, but whose entity is estimated from the data (hence can also be zero). While in the classical formulation the target signature is present only in the mean of the likelihood function, and recent work investigated tests based on the sole … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third parametric detector is obtained by an ad-hoc generalization of one of such GLRTs. Twostep GLRT-based detectors have been presented in our preliminary work [24]. The detectors derived here have different complexity and behavior.…”
Section: B Existing Results and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A third parametric detector is obtained by an ad-hoc generalization of one of such GLRTs. Twostep GLRT-based detectors have been presented in our preliminary work [24]. The detectors derived here have different complexity and behavior.…”
Section: B Existing Results and Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a fair comparison, only values that ensure practically the same performance of Kelly's detector under matched conditions are considered, in particular β = 0.5 and β = 0.8 for Kalson's detector and γ = 0.45 and γ = 0.4 for the KWA. For reference, the AMF [5], is also reported in all figures, because it is a well-known robust detector; however, 4 For completeness, we mention that [24] provides the general derivation (for any Σ) and a closed-form for Σ = C following the two-step GLRT approach, namely deriving the GLRT for known C and then using as replacement an estimate Ĉ (from secondary data); such detectors are however less powerful than one-step GLRTs. In Appendix C we show that for Σ = vv † the two-step GLRT is equivalent to the AMF, whereas the proposed one-step GLRT for the same choice of Σ is equivalent to Kelly's detector (ref.…”
Section: Performance Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, a framework to design robust decision schemes for pointlike targets has been proposed [18,19]. The idea is to add to the H 1 hypothesis a random component that makes it more plausible, hence hopefully the detector more robust to mismatches on the nominal steering vector v.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Motivated by the above results, we investigate the potential of this approach for robust detection of range-spread targets, i.e., we extend the modeling idea in [18,19] to the case of a target occupying more than one cell in range. In particular, we derive a robust GLRT-based detector for rangespread targets and also propose an ad hoc parametric receiver to obtain additional flexibility in the level of robustness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%