2005
DOI: 10.1136/gut.2005.070789
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of repeated tegaserod therapy in women with irritable bowel syndrome with constipation

Abstract: Background: It has been proposed that treatments for irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) should provide rapid symptomatic relief, be intermittent, and effective upon repeated use. Aims: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegaserod on IBS symptoms, and its impact on quality of life and health economic measures. Patients: Women (>18 years of age) with IBS-C according to the Rome II criteria. Methods: Prospective, double blind, placebo controlled, randomised trial. Women with IBS-C either recei… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
129
0
5

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
10
129
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, previous trials carried out with drugs having a clear-cut receptor-mediated effect have shown that even with such drugs, the therapeutic effect can be delayed: for instance, the statistical significant difference in improvement in abdominal discomfort ⁄ pain between 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod and placebo was not reached before day 3 in a large sample of 2660 patients. 28 Another explanation for the progressive effect of P ⁄ TMP on visceral pain is a possible inhibitory effect on enzymes involved in the pathogenesis of pain, rather than a receptor-mediated effect. Based on the glycerol-induced visceral pain, animal studies suggested that P ⁄ TMP may modulate the release of prostaglandins and ⁄ or other inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, previous trials carried out with drugs having a clear-cut receptor-mediated effect have shown that even with such drugs, the therapeutic effect can be delayed: for instance, the statistical significant difference in improvement in abdominal discomfort ⁄ pain between 5-HT4 receptor agonist tegaserod and placebo was not reached before day 3 in a large sample of 2660 patients. 28 Another explanation for the progressive effect of P ⁄ TMP on visceral pain is a possible inhibitory effect on enzymes involved in the pathogenesis of pain, rather than a receptor-mediated effect. Based on the glycerol-induced visceral pain, animal studies suggested that P ⁄ TMP may modulate the release of prostaglandins and ⁄ or other inflammatory mediators such as nitric oxide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the therapeutic gain associated with 5-HT3 antagonists [54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62] and 5-HT4 agonists [63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72] in treatment of sporadic IBS has been small, patients with PI-IBS are relatively more homogeneous and might demonstrate enhanced efficacy.…”
Section: Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A combination of simethicone plus activated charcoal and magnesium oxide was tested against placebo in a double blind, ran- [136] Ⅱ Lactobacillus plantarum 299v: improvement [137] Ⅲ Multispecies: improvement [138] Ⅲ Symbiotics Symbiotic mixture: no benefits [115,116] Ⅲ Antibiotics Rifaximin: reduction in bloating-specific scores [110] Ⅱ Rifaximin: improvement (39.5% vs 28.7%) [112] Ⅱ Prokinetics Tegaserod: improvement [120] Ⅰ Tegaserod: improvement [139][140][141] Ⅱ Tegaserod: no differences vs placebo [142] Ⅱ Prucalopride: improvement [126] Ⅱ Antispasmodic Otilonium bromide improvement [143] Ⅱ Mebeverine vs Otilonium bromide: improvement significantly achieved by both treatments [144] Ⅱ Antidepressant Paroxetine: no difference vs placebo [145] Ⅰ Citalopram: improvement [146] Ⅱ Fluoxetine: improvement [147] Ⅱ domized, multicenter trial in patients with FD meeting the Rome Ⅲ criteria [134] . This study showed a reductions in the intensity of post-prandial fullness, epigastric pain, epigastric burning and bloating in the active treatment arm compared to placebo [134] .…”
Section: Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%