1989
DOI: 10.1016/0168-8278(89)90418-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised controlled trial of interferon alfa 2A for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus infection: Factor, that influence response

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…30 This finding was similar to that of an early, randomized, dose-finding trial that identified high dose ð10 MU/m 2 per doseÞ IFN-a given subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 6 months achieved a superior therapeutic response ðP < .05Þ. 32 Furthermore, a 6-month duration of therapy was previously associated with an improved therapeutic response to IFN-a when compared to a 3-week duration of therapy. 33 In a follow-up metaanalysis, which captured an additional 9 years of data and included 24 randomized, controlled trials of 1299 HBeAg-positive patients, IFN-a therapy for treatment of CHB significantly improved rates of persistent ALT normalization ðþ26.2% ½95% CI: 18.3%-34%Þ; HBeAg ðþ24.3% ½95% CI: 8.3%-30.4%Þ and HBsAg ðþ5.6% ½95% CI: 3.5%-7.6%Þ clearance; and sustained loss of HBV DNA ðþ23.4% ½95% CI: 17.9%-28.8%Þ.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Agents For the Treatment Of Chronic Hepatitis Bsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 This finding was similar to that of an early, randomized, dose-finding trial that identified high dose ð10 MU/m 2 per doseÞ IFN-a given subcutaneously 3 times weekly for 6 months achieved a superior therapeutic response ðP < .05Þ. 32 Furthermore, a 6-month duration of therapy was previously associated with an improved therapeutic response to IFN-a when compared to a 3-week duration of therapy. 33 In a follow-up metaanalysis, which captured an additional 9 years of data and included 24 randomized, controlled trials of 1299 HBeAg-positive patients, IFN-a therapy for treatment of CHB significantly improved rates of persistent ALT normalization ðþ26.2% ½95% CI: 18.3%-34%Þ; HBeAg ðþ24.3% ½95% CI: 8.3%-30.4%Þ and HBsAg ðþ5.6% ½95% CI: 3.5%-7.6%Þ clearance; and sustained loss of HBV DNA ðþ23.4% ½95% CI: 17.9%-28.8%Þ.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Agents For the Treatment Of Chronic Hepatitis Bsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Additional predictors of a favorable response to IFN-a treatment include low baseline HBV DNA levels, high baseline ALT levels, HBV infection as an adult, and non-Asian ethnicity. 32,34,35 In patients with HBeAgnegative CHB, studies have suggested that a longer treatment duration ð24 vs. 6 monthsÞ of IFN-a treatment may be required for a sustained response. 36,37 Efficacy-pegylated-interferon.…”
Section: Pharmacologic Agents For the Treatment Of Chronic Hepatitis Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 15 A large proportion of non‐responders had detectable levels of neutralizing antibodies to IFN‐α. 16 …”
Section: Interferon Therapy In Adults With Chronic Hepatitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study by Perillo demonstrates that 5 MU daily is more effective than 1 MU daily [22]. Although the number of patients in the study by Brook using 2.5-10 MU/m 2 thrice weekly during 6 months, is rather small, this study also indicates that the results are dosedependent [23]. The Dusheiko study, however, demonstrates that doses of 18-50 MU do not result in higher response rates than regimens of 3-17 MU (10 MU/m 2) thrice weekly or 5 MU daily as used by other authors [21].…”
Section: Short-term Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…In the control group only 1 of the 9 patients improved from chronic active to chronic persistent hepatitis. Brook [23] found that in the 6 responders who had a second liver biopsy after 12 months posttreatment follow-up histology had improved, showing only chronic persistent hepatitis [23]. In the study by Perillo the liver biopsy specimens taken before randomization and 6 months after the completion of treatment indicated a regression of periportal necrosis in treated patients (p = 0.03 versus controls) and a trend towards reduced portal inflammation (p = 0.09), but no change in tobular inflammation or fibrosis [22].…”
Section: Long-term Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%