2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2016.10.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomised trial of post-discharge enteral feeding following surgical resection of an upper gastrointestinal malignancy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
18
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This is especially important in elderly patients 132 . Maintenance of enteral nutrition in home care (with home-based nutritional therapy) may contribute to increase nutritional intake after major operations 133 and prevent post-operative nutritional deterioration 134,135 .…”
Section: Howmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is especially important in elderly patients 132 . Maintenance of enteral nutrition in home care (with home-based nutritional therapy) may contribute to increase nutritional intake after major operations 133 and prevent post-operative nutritional deterioration 134,135 .…”
Section: Howmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Although we have no information on the use of postoperative enteral feeding and skeletal muscle index in this setting, enteral feeding has not demonstrated improvement in terms of postoperative weight loss. 3 Nagata et al 4 also studied postoperative skeletal muscle mass after esophagectomy and found that reduced skeletal muscle in the psoas muscle 6 months after esophagectomy did not correlate with preoperative nutrition status or neoadjuvant therapy. Their series showed no association with cancer recurrence, although the patients with presarcopenia at the 6-month mark did have more pneumonia and a doubling of 12-month mortality (24.1% vs 11.7%; p = 0.11).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most prior studies have focused on the benefit of home enteral nutrition and home parenteral nutrition (HPN) in EC patients undergoing esophagectomy (25)(26)(27). To our acknowledge, this study was the first RCT to compare a planned program of oral nutritional supplement to usual care in EC patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mean difference of BWL between the two groups was 1.89 and 1.97 kg, respectively, at 3 and 6 months. The study by Froghi et al (27), which investigated the value of 6 weeks enteral feeding following resection of an upper gastrointestinal malignancy, showed that the mean differences of BWL were 1.5 and 1.3 kg between the intervention group and control group at 12 and 24 weeks, respectively. Although these differences were obvious, there were not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%