2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02837-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) and laser acupuncture therapy (LAT) in patients with temporomandibular disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
61
0
12

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
61
0
12
Order By: Relevance
“…Ahrari et al [28] evaluated the effect of 810nm LLL in patients with myofascial pain one month after treatment and concluded that the effects of reducing the intensity of the pain and the increase in the mouth opening range were maintained. Some placebo-controlled studies indicated that LLLT was not effective compared to placebo [13,14,29]. In contrast, a recent study by Magri et al showed that there was no difference in the effects of active LLL or placebo on the decrease in pain intensity measured by VAS scale and sensory and affective pain components [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ahrari et al [28] evaluated the effect of 810nm LLL in patients with myofascial pain one month after treatment and concluded that the effects of reducing the intensity of the pain and the increase in the mouth opening range were maintained. Some placebo-controlled studies indicated that LLLT was not effective compared to placebo [13,14,29]. In contrast, a recent study by Magri et al showed that there was no difference in the effects of active LLL or placebo on the decrease in pain intensity measured by VAS scale and sensory and affective pain components [29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many studies have confirmed the effectiveness of low-level laser therapy in decreasing pain and improving the function of orofacial system in patients with TMDs [7][8][9][10][11][12]. On the other hand, the results of some placebo-controlled studies negate the positive effects of LLLT in reducing pain and improving function of orofacial system compared to placebo [13,14]. Since the results of previous research are inconsistent, increasing attention in the research is attributed to finding adequate radiation characteristics and LLLT protocols in TMD management.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface EMG, myofunctional procedure ratings, and assessment of masticatory efficiency are some of the employed objective approaches [ 42 ]. This systematic review also focused on improving the secondary outcomes like MO [ 5 , 9 , 10 , 14 – 16 , 26 , 28 , 30 , 34 , 37 , 43 – 47 ], LE and PE mandibular movements [ 10 , 14 – 16 , 26 , 28 , 34 , 37 , 43 46 , 48 ], PPT [ 14 , 34 , 35 , 44 , 46 , 49 , 50 ], EMG parameters [ 32 , 34 ], joint noises [ 5 , 28 ], TMD masticatory efficiency (ME) [ 49 , 51 ], subjective tinnitus [ 29 ], and occlusal contacts distribution [ 48 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The studies showed that the number of sessions per week ranged from 1–7. Most of the studies argued for 2 sessions per week [ 5 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 26 , 28 , 32 , 35 , 37 , 43 , 45 , 49 51 , 56 , 57 ]. However, there was no mention of the number of sessions/weeks in a few studies [ 25 28 , 30 , 34 , 47 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interincisal distance between the maxillary and mandibular incisal edges was measured by a ruler 18 . The magnitude of lateral jaw displacement was measured as the horizontal distance between the midpoints of the upper and lower central incisors 19 . In this study, ROM was evaluated at baseline, at week 1 and at week 4.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%