2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2137-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparison Between Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) and Structured Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) Intervention for Children with Autism

Abstract: Accumulating studies are documenting specific motivational variables that, when combined into a naturalistic teaching paradigm, can positively influence the effectiveness of interventions for children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The purpose of this study was to compare two ABA intervention procedures, a naturalistic approach, Pivotal Response Treatment (PRT) with a structured ABA approach in a school setting. A Randomized Clinical Trial design using two groups of children, matched according to age, se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
92
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Examination of the estimated increase in IQ score associated with increases in pivotal response training fidelity suggests that increasing fidelity to pivotal response training can lead to improvements in overall cognitive functioning. These findings are consistent with a recent randomized comparison of pivotal response training and discrete trial training, in which pivotal response training was more effective in improving outcomes for children with autism (Mohammadzaheri et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Examination of the estimated increase in IQ score associated with increases in pivotal response training fidelity suggests that increasing fidelity to pivotal response training can lead to improvements in overall cognitive functioning. These findings are consistent with a recent randomized comparison of pivotal response training and discrete trial training, in which pivotal response training was more effective in improving outcomes for children with autism (Mohammadzaheri et al 2014). …”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The intervention uses strategies such as child choice, interspersing maintenance tasks, task variation, the use of direct and natural reinforcers and rewarding attempts. It makes use of operant teaching principles (Mohammadzaheri, Koegal, Rezaee & Rafiee, 2014). The results show an instant increase in all of the childrenÕs joint attention initiations.…”
Section: Inclusion Of Restricted Interests Improves Positive Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…PRT's use of preferred activities and teaching in the context of naturally occurring routines (e.g., recess or classroom activities), along with the use of an abundant, face-valid resource (i.e., classmates) as interventionists, promotes the social development and generalization of social skills for children with ASD (R. L. Koegel, Dyer, & Bell, 1987). As PRT focuses on pivotal behaviours that produce widespread change, this intervention produces more enduring social skill gains than do some other ABA programs (Mohammadzaheri, Koegel, Rezaee, & Rafiee, 2014). Future research should focus on how to promote the uptake of this intervention approach at school (see Wood, McLeod, Klebanoff, & Brookman-Frazee, 2015, for another PMI example).…”
Section: Areas For Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%