1999
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.7.627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Clinical Trial of Supported Employment for Inner-city Patients With Severe Mental Disorders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
276
2
7

Year Published

2001
2001
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 345 publications
(306 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
14
276
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…There were relatively few differences between the five groups with regard to health, wellness, quality of life, self-esteem, and housing outcomes. This corroborates previous reports that the benefits of vocational services are limited to vocational outcomes [33,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were relatively few differences between the five groups with regard to health, wellness, quality of life, self-esteem, and housing outcomes. This corroborates previous reports that the benefits of vocational services are limited to vocational outcomes [33,[35][36][37][38].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Those who obtain CE via IPS have been shown to have improved self-esteem, quality of life, social inclusion, and psychiatric symptoms [20,[31][32][33], and improvements have been shown to be maintained during follow-up, for as many as 12 yr [7,34]. Although IPS has been associated with improvements in some nonvocational outcomes in observational outcome studies, these improvements have not been greater than those demonstrated by other rehabilitation programs when evaluated in randomized trials [33,[35][36][37][38]. Several other studies that favored IPS with regard to vocational outcomes failed to find greater improvement in non-vocational outcomes [27,37].…”
Section: Supported Employmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, there were differences in the methods used for addressing this interest among trials. For examples, Drake et al [46] and Howard et al [49] recruited people interested in work and assessed eligibility through introductory meetings, whereas Macias et al [54], due to the nature of their intervention model, did not screen for work interest. The study by Howard et al [49], which included a single introductory session, is likely to have recruited less motivated methodological quality, illustrating that the quality with which employment programs are implemented is particularly relevant in trials designed to assess the effectiveness of these programs.…”
Section: Ijomeh 2017;30(3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, both people with schizophrenia and their families and caregivers must remember that relapse is a possibility in the course of the illness. Therefore, better preparation and close accompaniment for coping with risk factors such as job stress might be useful patients, who would have been excluded from the study by Drake et al [46]. The availability of employment services and the benefit systems could also affect job placement, especially for people with prolonged illness, the long-term unemployed, and those who choose to work non-competitively.…”
Section: Ijomeh 2017;30(3)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En resumen, de este estudio se concluye que el IPS es un sistema de apoyo más efectivo que los otros programas tradicionales. En otro estudio de Drake et al, 51 nuevamente se observan resultados que indican una mayor efectividad del IPS en contraste con los sistemas de inserción tradicionales, tanto en la obtención de empleos competitivos como en el número de horas semanales trabajadas.…”
Section: • Puestos De Trabajo En Empresas Ordinarias En Condiciones Deunclassified