2013
DOI: 10.1179/2042618613y.0000000052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized clinical trial to compare the immediate effects of seated thoracic manipulation and targeted supine thoracic manipulation on cervical spine flexion range of motion and pain

Abstract: Pain reduction (post-treatment-pre-treatment) was significantly greater in those patients receiving the targeted supine thoracic manipulation compared to the seated thoracic manipulation (P<0.05). Although not significant, we did observe greater improvement in flexion ROM in the targeted supine thoracic manipulation group. The results of this study indicate that a targeted supine thoracic manipulation may be more effective in reducing cervical spine pain and improving cervical flexion ROM than a seated thoraci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, specifi c supine thoracic fl exion manipulation demonstrated a clinical benefi t for cervical pain reduction over nonspecifi c seated thoracic manipulation. 79 In the absence of consistent direction from scientifi c evidence, clinicians should use sound clinical decision making with regard for the impairments and functional limitations found during the examination when choosing which specifi c techniques to perform. Patient comfort during these techniques is a high priority and clinicians should consider this when assessing which technique to implement.…”
Section: Thoracic Hypomobility With Neck Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, specifi c supine thoracic fl exion manipulation demonstrated a clinical benefi t for cervical pain reduction over nonspecifi c seated thoracic manipulation. 79 In the absence of consistent direction from scientifi c evidence, clinicians should use sound clinical decision making with regard for the impairments and functional limitations found during the examination when choosing which specifi c techniques to perform. Patient comfort during these techniques is a high priority and clinicians should consider this when assessing which technique to implement.…”
Section: Thoracic Hypomobility With Neck Painmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the RI approach of using thoracic manipulation for the management of neck and shoulder pain has shown positive outcomes, many of the aforementioned studies only assess immediate, short-term outcomes. 14,[41][42][43]45,51 Few studies have followed patients for longer time frames, such as 12 months. 48 When considering the existing body of knowledge in this area, some important questions remain.…”
Section: Future Areas Of Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[5,6] Several studies have found that thoracic spine manipulation can increase cervical spine range of motion when reassessing the patient immediately or in the short-term after treatment. [3,[7][8][9][10][11][12][13] There is less evidence these outcomes remain significant in the medium-term, when follow-up is at least two weeks after the initial assessment. [14,15] There is also agreement that treating the thoracic spine will have immediate and short-term positive effects on neck pain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%