BACKGROUND:Popliteal block is a rarely performed regional anaesthetic technique because it requires placing the patient in prone position which is technically difficult. A recent technique called intertendinous or lateral approach which is done laterally can be done with patient in supine position itself. In this study, we have compared ease of nerve localization and complications between posterior and lateral approaches of Popliteal block. METHODS: 120 patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery were randomized to receive the block using either the posterior (n = 60) or the lateral approach (n = 60). With both techniques, 30mL of 1% alkalinized (by adding 1.5ml of 10% sodium bicarbonate) lignocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine were injected under nerve stimulation guidance. RESULTS: There were no differences in onset and duration of block between two techniques. The Posterior approach was associated with significant incidence of vascular puncture (10%) but lateral approach though technically difficult was safer with nil incidence of vascular puncture. CONCLUSIONS: Although, the lateral approach was technically difficult requiring more attempts (P value < 0.05) was safer, with no incidence of vascular puncture. KEYWORDS: Popliteal Block; Intertendinous Approach; Lignocaine; Nerve Stimulation; Vascular Puncture.
INTRODUCTION:Sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa (Popliteal block) is one of the anesthetic techniques used for lower extremity surgery. Compared to spinal anesthesia it has very less complications. 1 it results in adequate block for ankle and foot surgeries, carries no risk of hemodynamic changes, post dural puncture headache and provides good postoperative analgesia. Despite these potential advantages, popliteal block is not often administered; reasons include inadequate exposure, training and a highly unpredictable success rate 2 of the block.The most frequently used technique for popliteal block is the classical or posterior approach, where it has a disadvantage of placing the patient in prone position 3 but the newer lateral or intertendinous. 4 approach is done with supine position and is more patient friendly. In this study we are comparing the two techniques in respect to ease of administration, onset and duration of block and complications.