2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.04.090
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Comparison of High Clopidogrel Loading Doses in Patients With Non–ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes

Abstract: In low-to-moderate risk patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, clopidogrel LDs >300 mg provide a faster onset of action, a higher IPA plateau, and greater reductions in platelet activation during the first 24 h. A 900-mg LD may induce a greater antiplatelet effect than 600 mg, when compared with the standard 300-mg regimen. These findings require further clinical confirmation.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 478 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
54
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…30 In addition, increasing LDs of clopidogrel does not confer more clinical benefit. 19,20 In recent years, several studies have been launched focusing on VASP-guided clopidogrel modification in patients on clopidogrel. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein is an intracellular actin-regulatory protein that is a substrate of both cAMP-dependent and cGMP-dependent protein kinases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…30 In addition, increasing LDs of clopidogrel does not confer more clinical benefit. 19,20 In recent years, several studies have been launched focusing on VASP-guided clopidogrel modification in patients on clopidogrel. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein is an intracellular actin-regulatory protein that is a substrate of both cAMP-dependent and cGMP-dependent protein kinases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 -13 Several methods have been developed to deal with clopidogrel resistance, 14 of which the most popular strategy is increasing the loading dose (LD) utilized in patients undergoing PCI to 600 mg 15 -18 and 900 mg. 19,20 Although clopidogrel response is dose-dependent, there is a threshold to its platelet-inhibitory effect when certain doses are administrated. 19,20 In order to find a better method to tackle clopidogrel resistance, Bonello et al 21 adjusted the clopidogrel LD according to platelet monitoring using the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index in a multicenter randomized prospective study, and observed that it was safe and significantly improved the clinical outcomes after PCI in patients with clopidogrel resistance. In another study, Bonello et al 22 also demonstrated that tailoring the clopidogrel LD according to platelet reactivity monitoring decreased the rate of early stent thrombosis (ST) after PCI without increasing bleeding.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32 This finding was consistent with other previous studies. 33,34 Therefore, we suppose that the administration of first dosage of antiplatelet drug might rarely affect the predictive role of hsCRP in our study, given all patients received antiplatelet therapy. This speculation was affirmed by the similar distribution of hsCRP levels between our and other stroke studies.…”
Section: Strokementioning
confidence: 91%
“…It may also be related to the fact that a substantial fraction of the patients in the clopidogrel arm from the PLATO trial had received clopidogrel pretreatment and a large fraction also received a high clopidogrel loading dose. Given the need for clopidogrel to be transformed into its active metabolite to affect platelet function and given the improved metabolism and improved, more consistent, and faster inhibition of platelet function with increased loading doses, [21][22][23] both starting clopidogrel treatment early before PCI (rather than at the time of or after PCI) and using a 600-mg loading dose are associated with superior platelet inhibition and therefore will minimize the early contrast between randomized treatment arms. In addition, the use of intravenous glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockers in both treatment arms is expected to minimize contrast in platelet inhibition between treatment arms during the acute phase.…”
Section: Downloaded Frommentioning
confidence: 99%