2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2008.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized comparison of two motivationally enhanced Internet behavioral weight loss programs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
71
2
7

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
7
71
2
7
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Internet-based studies often incorporate online journaling and online submission of diaries to manage weight, the frequency of which has been correlated with greater short-term weight loss. 26,27 Consistent with these findings, an online food and exercise journal is an important component for weight loss in both behavioral and commercial weight-loss programs delivered over the Internet. 28,29 An important feature of selfmonitoring appears to be e-mailing daily food intake and energy expenditure journals to a weight-loss counselor rather than private record-keeping.…”
Section: Self-monitoring and Technologysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…For instance, Internet-based studies often incorporate online journaling and online submission of diaries to manage weight, the frequency of which has been correlated with greater short-term weight loss. 26,27 Consistent with these findings, an online food and exercise journal is an important component for weight loss in both behavioral and commercial weight-loss programs delivered over the Internet. 28,29 An important feature of selfmonitoring appears to be e-mailing daily food intake and energy expenditure journals to a weight-loss counselor rather than private record-keeping.…”
Section: Self-monitoring and Technologysupporting
confidence: 64%
“…The effect sizes did not differ significantly when studies with cluster randomized designs were included (d + = 1.98 and 0.40 for effects on progress monitoring and goal attainment, respectively) versus excluded (d + = 1.96 and 0.40, respectively), Q(1) = 0.33 and 0.02, p = 0.57 and 0.89. 6 The 20 studies used in the mediation analysis were Akers, Cornett, Savla, Davy, and Davy (2012), Boutelle, Kirschenbaum, Baker, and Mitchell (1999), Chambliss, Huber, Finlay, McDoniel, Kitzman-Ulrich, and Wilkinson (2011), Cussler et al (2008, Duran et al (2010), Gokee-La Rose, Gorin, andWing (2009), Hellerstedt andJeffrey (1997, behavior-focused phone group), Helsel et al (2007), Kempf, Tankova, and Martin (2013), ), Morgan et al (2009), Nguyen, Gill, Wolpin, Steele, and Benditt (2009), Pellegrini et al (2012), Runyan, Steenbergh, Bainbridge, Daugherty, Oke, and Fry (2013, Samuel-Hodge et al (2009), Tate et al (2001, Tan, Maganee, Chee, Lee, andTan (2011), Wang, Sereika, Chasens, Ewing, Matthews, andBurke (2012), Webber, Tate, and Bowling (2008), and Wing, Crane, Thomas, Kumar, and Weinberg (2010) if participants in the comparison condition were also asked to monitor their progress -a methodological feature that led to smaller effect sizes for progress monitoring. 7 For the purposes of this analysis we recomputed the effect size for goal attainment using only the measures for which the primary studies reported the correlation between the frequency of progress monitoring and goal attainment.…”
Section: Footnotesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two recent systematic reviews indicated that online social networks have been primarily used as an adjunct to in-person or web-based weight loss interventions, rather than as the primary treatment modality [18,19]. In previous studies, greater engagement in these online social networks predicted greater weight loss [20][21][22][23]. Thus, online social networks may represent an effective modality for delivering the entirety of an evidence-based weight loss program.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%