A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities

Gürgan, Sevil; Kütük, Zeynep Bilge; Çakır, Filiz Yalçın; Ergin, Esra

doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2019.07.013

Cited by 48 publications

(71 citation statements)

References 34 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Recent studies reported promising results in the regeneration of oral Materials 2021, 14, 755 2 of 10 tissues using stem cells, including mineralized dental tissues. In parallel with advances in tissue engineering, progress has been made in the field of mechanical and biomimetic properties of restorative materials [13,14]. In the last 10-15 years, new materials derived from high-viscosity glass ionomers have gained their place in restorative dentistry.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the last 10-15 years, new materials derived from high-viscosity glass ionomers have gained their place in restorative dentistry. These materials have improved mechanical properties, and studies have shown that in certain clinical situations, they may/can be the material of choice for long lasting fillings in the posterior region [13,14]. In 2007, GC Corporation (Tokyo, Japan) has introduced a new restorative concept consisting of two components: Fuji IX GP Extra (GC, Tokyo, Japan) highviscosity glass ionomer and nano-filled coating, which was later renamed Equia Fil.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of the study was to determine the wear rate of Equia Forte HT Fil with Equia Forte Coat or without coating and compare it with Fuji IX GP high-viscosity glass ionomer cement (GIC) in conditions with acid load or at neutral pH. The samples were stored for 7 days: (1) in artificial saliva, (2) in artificial saliva and cyclically exposed to low pH, and (3) in distilled water and cyclically exposed to low pH. Wear was determined by measuring the difference in mass before and after brushing in an abrasion testing device. The wear of Fuji IX GP was significantly higher than that of Equia Forte HT Fil with or without coating (p = 0.000). The difference between Equia Forte HT Fil with and without Coat was not statistically significant (p < 0.803). The differences in wear resistance between samples stored in saliva and in distilled water were not significant (p = 0.588). Periodic exposure to the low pH solution significantly affected the wear resistance of all materials (p = 0.000). Equia Forte HT Fil was more resistant to wear than Fuji IX GP in all storage conditions. A resinous coat did not significantly increase wear resistance.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[5][6][7] Either glass ionomer cement (GIC) A number of clinical trials have assessed the performance of GICs for restoring NCCLs, and these trials have demonstrated acceptable clinical results. [8][9][10][11] Fluoride release from GICs may provide effective tooth surface protection against demineralization, also supporting teeth integrity. 12 The weaker physical properties of GICs are considered as disadvantages compared to resin composites, along with their poor esthetic properties (e.g., limited range of shades).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial

et al. 2020

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial Objective: This randomized and clinical trial aimed to evaluate the performance of a new restorative Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) of patients with systemic diseases compared with a posterior resin composite after 12 months. Methodology: 134 restorations were placed at 30 patients presenting systemic diseases by a single clinician. NCCLs were allocated to two groups according to restorative system used: a conventional restorative GIC [Fuji Bulk (GC, Tokyo Japan) (FB)] and a posterior resin composite [G-aenial Posterior (GC, Tokyo Japan) (GP)] used with a universal adhesive using etch&rinse mode. All restorative procedures were conducted according to manufacturer's instructions. Restorations were scored regarding retention, marginal discoloration, marginal adaptation, secondary caries, surface texture, and post-operative sensitivity using modified United States Public Health Service (USPHS) criteria after 1 week (baseline), 6, and 12 months. Descriptive statistics were performed using chi-square tests. Cochran Q and Mc Nemar's tests were used to detect differences over time. Results: After 12 months, recall rate was 93% and the rates of cumulative retention failure for FB and GP were 4.9% and 1.6% respectively. Both groups presented similar alpha rates for marginal adaptation (FB 86.2%, GP 95.5%) and marginal discoloration (FB 93.8%, GP 97%) at 6-month recall, but FB restorations showed higher bravo scores than GP restorations for marginal adaptation and marginal discoloration after 12 months (p<0.05). Regarding surface texture, 2 FB restorations (3.1%) were scored as bravo after 6 months. All restorations were scored as alpha for secondary caries and postoperative sensitivity after 12 months. Conclusion: Although the posterior resin composite demonstrated clinically higher alpha scores than the conventional GIC for marginal adaptation and discoloration, both materials successfully restored NCCLs at patients with systematic disease after a year. Clinical relevance: Due to its acceptable clinical results, the tested conventional restorative GIC can be used for the restoration of NCCLs of patients with systemic diseases.

show abstract

“…However, in a randomized controlled study 10 year follow-up to evaluate the durability and clinical performance of a HVGIC (processed with a resinous coating) compared with a micro filled composite resin in conventional class I y II cavities, in permanent teeth isolated with cotton rolls and suction devices, no significant differences were found for both restorative materials in terms of marginal adaptation, anatomical form, secondary caries, postoperative sensitivity, surface texture, and retention. The HVGIC could be also considered a good alternative to amalgam 77 .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis

Ruiz¹,

Pérez-Guzmán²,

Rubio‐Aparicio³

et al. 2020

Sci Rep

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

the aim was to determine the survival of tooth-coloured restorative materials in proximal restorations of primary teeth at 24 months of follow-up and the influence of the following variables: use of coating, use of cavity conditioner, use of rubber dam isolation, the cavity form, the dentist's experience and the methodological characteristics of the studies. We conducted a search until May 2019, obtaining 16 articles from which 30 independent studies were extracted, which were considered as units of analysis. Four outcome measures were extracted from each study: retention, marginal integrity, anatomic form, and absence of recurrent caries. Separate meta-analyses were carried for each outcome and multiple meta-regression model was applied. The outcomes with the highest mean success rates were absence of recurrent caries and anatomic form. The type of material significantly influenced success rates. The best materials were resin-based material plus total-etching adhesion and resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), and the worst high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC). Atraumatic restorative treatment (ARt) had a lower success rate than the conventional cavity form. RMGic had the best clinical performance and HVGIC the worst. The form of the cavity, blinding and the experience of the operator were the variables that influenced success rates. Proximal primary molar restorations should be performed with RMGIC as it combines good mechanical performance of the resins together with the prevention of secondary caries of glass ionomers. The Global Burden of Disease 2015 study 1 concluded that oral health has not improved in the last 25 years: the age-standardized prevalence rate of untreated caries in primary teeth was 7.8% (573 million children) and 126 million children worldwide had incident cases of caries in primary teeth in 2015. Dental caries, according to the WHO, remains the most frequent chronic disease in early childhood in most communities around the world, having a negative impact on the quality of life of both the child and their family, and is considered a public health problem 2,3. The toxic effects on the patient, health professionals and the environment, the increasing prevalence of minimal intervention restorative approaches and the increased demand for aesthetics, have reduced the use of amalgam as the material of choice for the restoration of primary teeth 4,5. Currently, restorative treatments for primary teeth include a wide variety of tooth-coloured materials such as glass ionomer cements (GIC), resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RMGIC), high viscosity glass ionomer cement (HVGIC), compomers and composite resins (CR). In general, composites are recommended in children with a low risk of caries, compomers in children with a moderate risk and glass ionomers in children with a high risk 6. GICs are good materials for the primary dentition 7 due to their ability to adhere to the dental structure, low polymerization contraction, lack of postoperative sensitivity, biological compatibility and th...

show abstract

A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities

Cited by 48 publications

References 34 publications

Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material

Effect of Nano-Filled Protective Coating and Different pH Enviroment on Wear Resistance of New Glass Hybrid Restorative Material

One-year evaluation of a new restorative glass ionomer cement for the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions in patients with systemic diseases: a randomized, clinical trial

Success rate of proximal tooth-coloured direct restorations in primary teeth at 24 months: a meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About