1996
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1996.02170290029004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Controlled Effectiveness Trial of an AIDS Prevention Program for Low-Income African-American Youths

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
181
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 216 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies met more than 1 exclusion criteria. Four studies were excluded because they lacked a control group 23-26 ; 9 did not report parent-adolescent communication outcome data [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] ; 1 did not report outcome data for parent participants, only for adolescent participants 36 ; 3 included parents of younger children but did not stratify outcome data on the basis of the age of participating parents' children 25,26,37 ; 1 only included parents of preschool-aged children 38 ; parents participated in multiple interventions simultaneously in 1 study, which made it impossible to determine the individual effects of the parent-adolescent communication program 39 ; and 4 included non-US samples. [40][41][42][43] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies met more than 1 exclusion criteria. Four studies were excluded because they lacked a control group 23-26 ; 9 did not report parent-adolescent communication outcome data [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] ; 1 did not report outcome data for parent participants, only for adolescent participants 36 ; 3 included parents of younger children but did not stratify outcome data on the basis of the age of participating parents' children 25,26,37 ; 1 only included parents of preschool-aged children 38 ; parents participated in multiple interventions simultaneously in 1 study, which made it impossible to determine the individual effects of the parent-adolescent communication program 39 ; and 4 included non-US samples. [40][41][42][43] …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peer influences may have been particularly salient in the current study because 64% of SHERO's participants reported that they always came to the sessions with their friends. The potentially positive influence of peers is supported by reviews of existing HIV prevention interventions, which have shown that perceived norms and social connectedness are key factors in successful interventions for adolescents (Kirby, 2001;Pedlow & Carey, 2004), as well as findings from friendshipbased HIV prevention interventions that utilize the power of peer norms to support positive behavior change (Dolcini et al, 2008;Stanton et al, 1996). Forthcoming manuscripts will conduct more in-depth moderation and mediation analyses to further explore the effects of such psychosocial outcomes (e.g., peer norms, perceptions of a woman's control of her sexuality, acceptability of sexual coercion and assault) on sexual health-related behaviors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Most of the published studies are based on a strong theoretical foundation and target sexual behavior-related cognition and skills using multiple small group sessions. [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] Few of the current generation of efficacious interventions for youth have focused specifically on adolescent women of color considered by recent epidemiologic studies to be at highest risk for HIV, however. As shown in the Table, there are eight interventions that have demonstrated efficacy in female adolescents.…”
Section: Current Generation Of Behavioral Hiv Prevention Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%