2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2012.03896.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial comparing the AccuVein AV300 device to standard insertion technique for intravenous cannulation of anesthetized children

Abstract: There were 146 patients with a median age of 4.6 years (range, 0.18-17.1 years), 46.6% were male, 80.8% were light skin colored, and 15.7% were younger than 2 years. The first-attempt success rates were 75% (95% CI, 63.8-84.2%) using AV300 and 73% (95% CI, 61.9-81.9%) using the standard method (P = 0.85). Patients with dark or medium skin color were 0.38 times less likely to have a successful first attempt than patients with light skin color. The difference between the two treatment groups in number of skin pu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
71
0
6

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(89 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
2
71
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…They were the VeinViewer [1, 66] (Christie Medical Holdings, Memphis, TN, USA), VascuLuminator [67] (De Koningh Medical Systems, Arnhem, NL), and AccuVein [68] (AccuVein LLC, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA). The VeinViewer was approved for use by the FDA in 2005 [66].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They were the VeinViewer [1, 66] (Christie Medical Holdings, Memphis, TN, USA), VascuLuminator [67] (De Koningh Medical Systems, Arnhem, NL), and AccuVein [68] (AccuVein LLC, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, USA). The VeinViewer was approved for use by the FDA in 2005 [66].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study conducted by Kadddoum et al [68] performed by experienced pediatric anesthesiologists in the operating room (OR) in patients (0–17.1 years old), the efficacy of AccuVein was compared to that of standard care, but this time no difference was seen in the first attempt success rate, number of skin punctures, or the time to successful cannulation of the two groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies assessing the use of infrared technology for the cannulation of children and adults in other clinical settings exist. Kaddoum et al [1] examined its use for cannulation of 146 paediatric cancer patients who had been referred for surgery or diagnostic imaging under anaesthesia. Although the study concluded that the infrared device was easy to use and did improve visualisation of veins, there was no significant statistical difference in the first attempt success rates, number of skin punctures or time to successful cannulation between the standard method (visualisation and palpation) versus the use of the AV300 device.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These devices have been available for several years now and, despite being easy to use, there is still a paucity of evidence that either device reduces either time to cannulation or number of attempts. 5,6 Ultrasound: ultrasound-guided central venous access in children is faster, has a higher success rate and a reduced complication rate compared to landmark techniques, and has consequently become a standard of care. 7 Ultrasound is also useful for peripheral intravenous cannulation and has been shown to enable faster cannulation after fewer cannulation attempts in children presenting with difficult venous access.…”
Section: Vascular Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%