The postoperative period for patients has been a focus of research for decades. In the early 1940s, a number of publications began to surface that challenged the common practice of therapeutic bed rest after surgery. 1 The resulting evidence demonstrated that allowing patients to ambulate by actively sitting up in a chair or getting up and walking had a significant effect on reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. In more recent years, devicespecific therapies have emerged with the goal of improving lung function by either encouraging particular breathing patterns and effort by patients, or by generating positive airway pressure to reduce atelectasis and increase functional residual capacity.A number of studies have evaluated lung expansion therapies and their effect on lung volume changes as postoperative interventions to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications. 2,3 More than 30 years ago, Stock and colleagues demonstrated that use of incentive spirometry (IS) after upper abdominal surgery did not increase functional residual capacity compared to coughing and deep breathing. 2 Similarly, in cardiac bypass patients, Jenkins and colleagues 3 showed that IS did not result in an increase in functional residual capacity compared to early mobilization and huffing and coughing exercises. A Cochran review published in 2014 4 found no differences in clinical complications, respiratory failure, and pulmonary complications when the use of incentive spirometry was compared to no therapy or physiotherapy after abdominal surgery. More recently, a study randomized 387 patients to receive physiotherapy combined with IS (n ϭ 195) or physiotherapy alone (n ϭ 192) after lung resection surgery and prior to the patients being able to ambulate independently. 5 They found no significant difference in postoperative pulmonary complications at 30 d and no difference between groups in pneumonia rates, need for mechanical ventilation, home oxygen, length of hospital stay, or readmission. 5