A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of a Brief Intervention to Increase Chlamydia and Gonorrhea Testing Uptake Among Young Adult Female Emergency Department Patients

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of this study was to test the effect of a brief educational and counseling intervention on increasing the uptake of free testing for Chlamydia trachomatis (chlamydia) and Neisseria gonorrhea (gonorrhea) among young female emergency department (ED) patients. Women are particularly vulnerable to more serious consequences of these infections due to asymptomatic presentation. Increased testing is important to detect, treat, and halt the spread of these infections among asymptomatic women.Methods: This was a randomized controlled trial. Research assistants (RAs) approached female patients in two EDs. Eligible patients were between 18 and 35 years of age, who reported having sex with males, but were not attending the ED for either treatment of sexually transmitted infection (STI) or testing for possible STI exposure. Participants responded to survey questions about their lifetime and past 3-month substance use, number of recent sexual partners, condom use, and perception of risks for chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Following the survey, the RAs randomized participants into study control or treatment arms. Each treatment arm participant received a brief educational/counseling intervention from the RA. The brief intervention focused on the woman's personal risks for chlamydia and gonorrhea and condoms attitudes and usage. As the primary outcome of this study, participants were offered free urine tests for chlamydia and gonorrhea infection postintervention or post-survey completion, depending on group assignment.Results: A total of 171 women completed the baseline assessment and were offered chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. The mean (AESD) age was 26 (AE4.76) years, 18% were Hispanic, and 12% were Spanish-speaking only. The brief intervention that was offered to increase these women's awareness of their STI risk did not result in increased acceptance of testing; 48% in the brief intervention group accepted testing (95% confidence interval [CI] = 32% to 64%) versus 36% in the control group (95% CI = 19% to 53%). In a multivariable logistic regression, only self-identifying as being Hispanic was associated with greater willingness to be tested. Of the asymptomatic women tested (n = 71), five tested positive for chlamydia. This represents a positivity rate of 7%. There were no positive test results for gonorrhea. Women who reported high-risk factors for STI, such as younger age (≤25 years), having sex in the past 90 days without using condoms, identified substance use, or previous STI, were not more likely to accept the offer of chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Conclusions:The brief intervention used in this study did not increase the uptake of testing for chlamydia and gonorrhea infections in this sample, in comparison to receiving no intervention. Although Hispanic women were more likely to accept chlamydia and gonorrhea testing, it is concerning that those women who report STI risk factors were not more likely to accept the offer of chlamydia and gonorrhea testing. Future research sh...

Sexual History Documentation and Sexually Transmitted Infection Screening for Mental Health Patients in a Pediatric Emergency Department

“…8,18 It has also been demonstrated that female providers are more likely to screen for STIs than male providers. 18 Although some previous studies have shown parental presence to be a barrier to STI screening, 19,20 others have not demonstrated that effect. 8,21 This study did not examine the effect of parental presence on obtaining a history or screening for STIs.…”

Screening and brief intervention for substance use disorders in times of COVID-19: potential opportunities, adaptations, and challenges

“…SBIRT is based on behavior change communication (BCC) and motivational interviewing (MI), which is applicable to a wide spectrum of harmful behaviors such as high-risk sexual behavior, unhealthy food habits, and lifestyle (38,39). BI has been found to be acceptable but with variable effectiveness in promoting screening for sexually transmitted diseases (40,41). Randomized clinical trials on SBI have targeted both alcohol use and other risk behaviors such as high-risk sexual behavior, HIV-risk behaviors, and aggression.…”