2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11606-008-0663-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Controlled Trial of a Close Monitoring Program for Minor Depression and Distress

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In one randomized clinical trial, a close monitoring program was shown to be effective in reducing the likelihood of mental health issues among those with minor depression or with distress only. 67 The generally high rates of depressive disorders in chronic physical illnesses documented by our study suggest the need for a continuum of care encompassing both physical and mental illness care domains.…”
Section: Depression and Women Veterans 1479mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…In one randomized clinical trial, a close monitoring program was shown to be effective in reducing the likelihood of mental health issues among those with minor depression or with distress only. 67 The generally high rates of depressive disorders in chronic physical illnesses documented by our study suggest the need for a continuum of care encompassing both physical and mental illness care domains.…”
Section: Depression and Women Veterans 1479mentioning
confidence: 71%
“…This study was a secondary analysis of a data set collected between October 2004 and February 2006 at the Behavioral Health Laboratory (BHL) of the Philadelphia Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Medical Center (6). The goal of the original study was to test whether a program of close monitoring of symptoms helped a primary care sample of veterans with subsyndromal depression.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, we identified a number of welldesigned studies that examined access interventions, but they were not included in our review because they did not include data regarding either actual or perceived access outcomes. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] Therefore, there are studies that report on the impact of access interventions on downstream outcomes that are not included in this review. As discussed above, we suggest that future research examining access interventions collect and compare a broad range of perceived and actual access outcomes across groups.…”
Section: 16mentioning
confidence: 99%