2006
DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.163.1.88
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Sequential Bilateral Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Treatment-Resistant Depression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
201
1
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 319 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
14
201
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the results may have been confounded by non-specific effects given that we have not included a sham control group. Second, whilst we have provided treatment for 4 weeks, studies are now testing rTMS methods over longer periods of time (Fitzgerald et al, 2006a;O'Reardon et al, 2007). It is possible that the standard group could 'catch up' in their response rates with a longer duration of treatment, although there is no clear rationale as to why targeting would accelerate rather than enhance responses.…”
Section: Comorbid/diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the results may have been confounded by non-specific effects given that we have not included a sham control group. Second, whilst we have provided treatment for 4 weeks, studies are now testing rTMS methods over longer periods of time (Fitzgerald et al, 2006a;O'Reardon et al, 2007). It is possible that the standard group could 'catch up' in their response rates with a longer duration of treatment, although there is no clear rationale as to why targeting would accelerate rather than enhance responses.…”
Section: Comorbid/diagnosesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS), applied to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC), has been investigated actively as an alternative intervention for patients with treatment-resistant depression (TRD) (eg George et al, 1995George et al, , 2000Fitzgerald et al, 2003Fitzgerald et al, , 2006a. Most trials have suggested that the active rTMS treatment has greater antidepressant efficacy than sham stimulation (Fitzgerald, 2006), including a large international multi-site trial (O'Reardon et al, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, we retained 19 RCTs in our meta-analysis [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] , totaling 181 patients with bipolar disorder (type I, N540; type II, N520; unspecified, N5121). The RCTs employed different stimulation targets: the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [1][2][3][4][5][6][9][10][11]13,16,17 , the right DLPFC 8,14,15,18 , or bilateral DLPFC 7,12,17,19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RCTs employed different stimulation targets: the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) [1][2][3][4][5][6][9][10][11]13,16,17 , the right DLPFC 8,14,15,18 , or bilateral DLPFC 7,12,17,19 . The majority of studies delivered high-frequency stimulation (HFS) 1,3-6,9-13,16,18 , while some delivered low-frequency stimulation (LFS) 3 The issue of treatment-emergent affective switches in managing bipolar depression is important and controversial, and extends to neuromodulatory treatments.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding left vs. right stimulation, the accumulated evidence favors the former as more studies were performed stimulating the left DLP-FC 74 ; and the evidence for low-frequency right DLPFC is mixed [75][76][77] . However, low-frequency rTMS seems to be better tolerated 78 and might be an interesting approach in selected cases.…”
Section: Parameters Of Stimulationmentioning
confidence: 99%