2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Rib Fixation in Polytrauma Patients With Flail Chest

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
56
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Conventional frequentist meta-analysis may be suboptimal because few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared SSRF with nonoperative management. [17][18][19][20][21] Bayesian meta-analysis has distinct advantages over conventional meta-analysis for comparing SSRF with nonoperative management: it allows intuitive interpretation (eg, there is an x% probability that SSRF is associated with lower mortality than non-operative management); it incorporates inherent bias of observational evidence rather than equally pooling observational and RCT evidence, and it accurately presents uncertainty of pooled effect estimates. [22][23][24] We consolidated up-to-date evidence comparing SSRF and non-operative management effects on pulmonary complications and mortality after rib fractures using Bayesian meta-analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] Conventional frequentist meta-analysis may be suboptimal because few randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have compared SSRF with nonoperative management. [17][18][19][20][21] Bayesian meta-analysis has distinct advantages over conventional meta-analysis for comparing SSRF with nonoperative management: it allows intuitive interpretation (eg, there is an x% probability that SSRF is associated with lower mortality than non-operative management); it incorporates inherent bias of observational evidence rather than equally pooling observational and RCT evidence, and it accurately presents uncertainty of pooled effect estimates. [22][23][24] We consolidated up-to-date evidence comparing SSRF and non-operative management effects on pulmonary complications and mortality after rib fractures using Bayesian meta-analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…704 papers were retrieved in total, in which 83 papers were selected after excluding 621 papers that were identical and not in line with this study through reading the title and the abstract. After reading the whole article, 78 papers that did not meet the inclusion criteria were excluded and 5 papers were included finally [16][17][18][19][20]. The retrieval process is shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic features of the articles 5 included are shown in Table 1. [16][17][18][19][20] were included to analyze the respiratory support time (day). The heterogeneity among these 5 studies was observed (I 2 = 94.6%, P = 0.000 < 0.1), so the random effect model was adopted for Meta-analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The mechanisms through which rib fractures cause pneumonia are generally explained by pain [28], decreased vital capacity [29], and changes in chest wall dynamics that distort the movement of chest wall muscle [30]. The frequency of pneumonia increases with the number of rib fractures, particularly in elderly patients [26] and those with frail chest injuries [27].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%