2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2005.00235.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Acupuncture for Chronic Daily Headache

Abstract: Headache-specialty medical management alone was not associated with improved clinical outcomes among our study population. Supplementing medical management with acupuncture, however, resulted in improvements in health-related QoL and the perception by patients that they suffered less from headaches.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
58
1
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
58
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The largest of these, which compared 132 verum patients with 63 sham controls [29], reported smaller overall decreases in headache days per month with no statistically significant differences between groups (41% verum vs. 37% sham, p=0.58 compared to 62% verum vs. 50% sham, p<0.001). The results of the other large randomised trial for chronic headache cannot be directly compared with ours as headache days was not an endpoint; nonetheless, a statistically significant difference was reported between patients randomised to acupuncture plus specialist headache care compared to those receiving specialist headache care alone [23]. The results of the trials appear somewhat discordant: it is for future meta-analysts to determine the extent differences between the trials are greater than what would be expected by chance, indicating genuine heterogeneity in treatments or patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The largest of these, which compared 132 verum patients with 63 sham controls [29], reported smaller overall decreases in headache days per month with no statistically significant differences between groups (41% verum vs. 37% sham, p=0.58 compared to 62% verum vs. 50% sham, p<0.001). The results of the other large randomised trial for chronic headache cannot be directly compared with ours as headache days was not an endpoint; nonetheless, a statistically significant difference was reported between patients randomised to acupuncture plus specialist headache care compared to those receiving specialist headache care alone [23]. The results of the trials appear somewhat discordant: it is for future meta-analysts to determine the extent differences between the trials are greater than what would be expected by chance, indicating genuine heterogeneity in treatments or patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…15,21 Clinical effects of each of these two therapies alone have been widely studied. The effects of acupuncture on alleviating symptoms and improving QoL are supported in some studies [22][23][24][25] ; however, negative results have also been reported in the literature. 26,27 Studies that included RR as part of the study intervention reported beneficial effects of the intervention on enhancing immune function, reducing psychologic distress, and improving QoL among patients with HIV/AIDS.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…There was also little impact of including summary data from RCTs for which raw data were not obtained (two RCTs) 128,129 or which were published recently (four RCTs), [124][125][126][127] either for the primary analysis or the analysis with the outlying RCTs by Vas et al [120][121][122] excluded (data not shown).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%