2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2018.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized controlled trial of the judicious use of safety behaviors during exposure therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting this view, Goetz et al (2016) found little evidence of negative treatment outcomes associated with safety behavior usage in their systematic review of the anxiety treatment literature. Similarly, Blakey et al (2019) tested the effects of safety behavior usage during exposure therapy amongst participants with spider phobia who were randomly assigned to use or drop safety behaviors. Results indicated that participants in the two conditions did not differ in their assessment of the tolerability of the exposure exercises or in their peak distress levels or levels of distress tolerance.…”
Section: Mask-wearing As a Safety Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting this view, Goetz et al (2016) found little evidence of negative treatment outcomes associated with safety behavior usage in their systematic review of the anxiety treatment literature. Similarly, Blakey et al (2019) tested the effects of safety behavior usage during exposure therapy amongst participants with spider phobia who were randomly assigned to use or drop safety behaviors. Results indicated that participants in the two conditions did not differ in their assessment of the tolerability of the exposure exercises or in their peak distress levels or levels of distress tolerance.…”
Section: Mask-wearing As a Safety Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our considerations are in line with Wu et al [ 9 ] who proposed that Family Accommodation operates contrary to the goals of exposure and response prevention, the first line treatment for OCD [ 46 , 47 ]. Indeed, as suggested by Blakey et al [ 48 ], within the Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) approach, exposure consists in repeated and prolonged confrontation with situations and stimuli that trigger obsessions (e.g., books ordered the “wrong way”). Response prevention includes resisting urges to perform behaviours such as avoidance and compulsive rituals (e.g., ordering) during and after exposure trials.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding FA, clinicians may not need to be overly focused or concerned if parents are unwilling to eliminate all FA, at least initially, as long as the parent and child can explicitly test their fear-based expectancies through exposure with the feared situation or event. Instead of the metric of success being reduction in affect, the development of new non-threat associations and the enhancement of accessible and retrievable newly learned associations may increase the effectiveness of exposure (Blakey et al, 2019). Thus the goal of exposure within the ACT framework mirrors that of inhibitory learning theory in that the individual learns to act with the feared situation in a more functional manner so that the individual moves in the direction of values and things that are important and that are currently disrupted (Twohig et al, 2015), in this case the parent-child relationship.…”
Section: Committed Actionmentioning
confidence: 99%