2007
DOI: 10.4103/0301-4738.30707
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, crossover, open label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Xalatan ® in comparison with generic Latanoprost (Latoprost) in subjects with primary open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
1
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
37
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…8 Another study from India showed a significant difference in intraocular pressure between Latoprost and Xalatan at week 12 but none at week 24. 9 A larger 12-week study in Italy confirmed the noninferiority of generic latanoprost. 10 With regard to adverse events, Japanese authors have described the development of a corneal epithelial disorder following administration of Laparoprost eye drops.…”
Section: Efficacy and Safetymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…8 Another study from India showed a significant difference in intraocular pressure between Latoprost and Xalatan at week 12 but none at week 24. 9 A larger 12-week study in Italy confirmed the noninferiority of generic latanoprost. 10 With regard to adverse events, Japanese authors have described the development of a corneal epithelial disorder following administration of Laparoprost eye drops.…”
Section: Efficacy and Safetymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The 33 IOP data sets from 29 articles (4 studies were cross-over designs and contributed 2 IOP data sets each) investigating latanoprost provided 1-month data, 4,6,8,9, and 14 data sets from 13 articles (1 study was a cross-over design and contributed 2 data sets) provided 3-month data. [7][8][9][10]15,18,[37][38][39][40][41][42][43] Details of the latanoprost studies are provided in Table 2. Of the 17 studies categorized as nonindustry, 3 disclosed funding sources that included Red Temática de Investigación en Bias in industry-funded trials-Jinapriya et al…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The difference in IOP lowering could be caused by the difference in adjuvants. 21 The safety of the 2 drugs was evaluated based on their discomfort symptoms and discomfort scores. There were no significant differences in terms of the discomfort symptoms and discomfort score in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%