2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.09.020
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Multicenter Study Comparing a Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Balloon With a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Vessels

Abstract: Treatment of small-vessel disease with a paclitaxel DEB was associated with less angiographic late loss and similar rates of restenosis and revascularization as a PES. (Balloon Elution and Late Loss Optimization [BELLO]; Study NCT01086579).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

8
168
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 293 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
8
168
3
Order By: Relevance
“…These high restenosis rates in patients treated with a DCB and an additional BMS were explained by geographical mismatch that was present in 77% of patients with restenosis but only in 19% in patients without restenosis. In addition, there were 2 randomized trials in the field 21, 22. The PICCOLETO (Paclitaxel‐Eluting Balloon Versus Paclitaxel‐Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Artery Diseases) study compared a paclitaxel‐eluting balloon (Dior; Eurocor, Bonn, Germany) to a first‐generation paclitaxel‐eluting stent (Taxus; Boston Scientific) in small coronary vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These high restenosis rates in patients treated with a DCB and an additional BMS were explained by geographical mismatch that was present in 77% of patients with restenosis but only in 19% in patients without restenosis. In addition, there were 2 randomized trials in the field 21, 22. The PICCOLETO (Paclitaxel‐Eluting Balloon Versus Paclitaxel‐Eluting Stent in Small Coronary Artery Diseases) study compared a paclitaxel‐eluting balloon (Dior; Eurocor, Bonn, Germany) to a first‐generation paclitaxel‐eluting stent (Taxus; Boston Scientific) in small coronary vessels.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In BASKET‐SMALL 2, predilatation and avoidance of geographical mismatch was therefore a prerequisite before randomization into a treatment arm. This new concept of DCB treatment (eg, optimal lesion preparation by conventional plain old balloon angioplasty and drug delivery with DCB in case of a good angiographic result) is novel and based on current guidelines 22, 23…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…16) As a first-line interventional treatment for in-stent restenosis during the DES era, the usefulness of DCB has almost been established. 7,8) In contrast, for de novo coronary artery lesions, no definite evidence supporting the superiority of DCB over DES is available, 17,18) while a few registries have shown acceptable results regarding the safety and efficacy of DCB in de novo coronary lesions. 19,20) In the Valentines II, a prospective registry of 109 lesions in 103 patients with stable or unstable angina and/or positive stress test with de novo lesions of > 50% stenosis undergoing plain old balloon angioplasty followed by DCB dilation, the primary endpoint of major adverse cardiac events at 8 months was 8.7% with 1% all-cause death, 1% myocardial infarction, and 2.9% target lesion revascularization (TLR), despite the 11.9% bail-out bare metal stent (BMS) implantation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, only two relatively small studies evaluated the efficacy of DCB in small vessels (9,10). One of which was terminated early since the very early generation DCB used failed to reduce neointimal proliferation.…”
Section: Editorial Best Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Approach Fmentioning
confidence: 99%