2019
DOI: 10.4103/ijdvl.ijdvl_801_16
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized, open-label, comparative study of oral tranexamic acid and tranexamic acid microinjections in patients with melasma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…One RCT compared monthly intralesional therapy (4 mg/ml) and oral therapy (250 mg twice a day) for 3 months. The 64‐person study found that both groups significantly decreased MASI score (Oral p < 0.01, intralesional p = 0.047); however, the oral therapy group had a more significant decrease than the intralesional group ( p < 0.001) 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One RCT compared monthly intralesional therapy (4 mg/ml) and oral therapy (250 mg twice a day) for 3 months. The 64‐person study found that both groups significantly decreased MASI score (Oral p < 0.01, intralesional p = 0.047); however, the oral therapy group had a more significant decrease than the intralesional group ( p < 0.001) 40 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The 64-person study found that both groups significantly decreased MASI score (Oral p < 0.01, intralesional p = 0.047); however, the oral therapy group had a more significant decrease than the intralesional group (p < 0.001). 40 An additional RCT compared oral therapy (250 mg twice daily) to intralesional injections at both 100 mg/ml and 4 mg/ml concentrations every 2 weeks for 8 weeks with significant decreases in mMASI of all groups. No significant differences were found between groups.…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Once TA is stopped for several months, patients who take TA orally or in combination with conventional external drugs have a certain degree of recurrence and an elevated MASI, which is also consistent with the results reported by Ebrahim et al 33 In conclusion, we figured that oTA + RTA is the best mode of administration. To investigate the reason, the dose and frequency of oTA or with RTA agents were 500 mg/day, 16,17,31,36,37,54,55,57,63,64 while the frequency of iTA and MNsTA was basically once every 2 or 4 weeks, and the concentration of liquid medicine was 4 mg/mL. [16][17][18]27,33,36,39,40,47,48,51 Therefore, oTA with high-frequency and concentration had a faster effect than iTA and MNsTA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the distinction between the effectiveness of local or intradermal adjuvant TA treatment and oral administration remains unclear. In the study conducted by Khurana VK et al, 16 it was found that the oral administration of TA (250 mg twice daily) yielded superior results compared to the intradermal injection (4 mg/mL) of TA. However, Sharma et al 17 discovered that there was an equivalent whitening effect observed in both the oral TA group with 250 mg twice daily and the intradermal injection group with 4 mg/mL in a period of 4 weeks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…5 The treatment regimen that is most commonly used is monthly intradermal microinjections of TXA 4 mg/mL at the site of melasma, keeping a distance of around 1 cm from each injection. 5,6 Reported side effects are mild and include irritation, erythema, scaling, and xerosis. 3 Hypopigmentation was reported as a side effect of oral TXA treatment but evidence of its association with intradermal TXA microinjections is lacking.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%