2009
DOI: 10.1182/blood-2009-01-198093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A randomized phase 3 study of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care, including hydroxyurea, in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia in patients 70 years or older

Abstract: This phase 3, multicenter, open-label study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib compared with best supportive care (BSC), including hydroxyurea, as first-line therapy in elderly patients (≥70 years) with newly diagnosed, de novo, or secondary acute myeloid leukemia. A total of 457 patients were enrolled with 24% 80 years of age or older. Tipifarnib 600 mg orally twice a day was administered for the first 21 consecutive days, in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The median su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
77
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yet, 1-year survival estimates appear similar between the two trials. Likewise, the decitabine results compare favorably with other treatment approaches in unfit patients (11,17,(26)(27)(28). The current standard for this group is low-dose cytarabine, based on positive survival results from a randomized trial of cytarabine vs. hydroxyurea and best supportive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, 1-year survival estimates appear similar between the two trials. Likewise, the decitabine results compare favorably with other treatment approaches in unfit patients (11,17,(26)(27)(28). The current standard for this group is low-dose cytarabine, based on positive survival results from a randomized trial of cytarabine vs. hydroxyurea and best supportive care.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies using diverse combinations of drugs are currently underway. New agents, such as clofarabine, laromustine, tipifarnib [28], and gemtuzumab ozogamicin [29], are currently being assessed as potential prognosis improvers in the clinical trial setting on an elderly AML patient population. In our study, a novel regimen containing fludarabine was designed with the goal of overcoming drug resistance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a single agent, the overall response rate (ORR) is <20% (Harousseau et al, 2007;Lancet et al, 2007;Morgan & Sowa, 2007) with significant gastrointestinal, neurologic and infectious toxicities (Karp et al, 2001;Laubach & Rao, 2008). Compared to supportive care in older patients, tipifarnib alone did not result in an OS advantage (Harousseau et al, 2009), and may be best used as a maintenance therapy for patients in CR with high relapse risk .…”
Section: Farnesyl Transferase Inhibitorsmentioning
confidence: 99%