2004
DOI: 10.1097/00004583-200405000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial of a School-Based Depression Prevention Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
206
3
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 209 publications
(217 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
6
206
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study using RAP, Merry, McDowell, Wild, et al (2004) conducted a randomized "placebo-controlled" trial with 9 th and 10 th grade students (N = 392) in New Zealand. Whereas some students received the RAP-Kiwi program, other students engaged in an 11-week program including fun activities that were thought to be pleasurable but not actively prophylactic against depression.…”
Section: Universal Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study using RAP, Merry, McDowell, Wild, et al (2004) conducted a randomized "placebo-controlled" trial with 9 th and 10 th grade students (N = 392) in New Zealand. Whereas some students received the RAP-Kiwi program, other students engaged in an 11-week program including fun activities that were thought to be pleasurable but not actively prophylactic against depression.…”
Section: Universal Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particularly in cases where follow-up assessments are spread far apart, interpretations of omnibus tests are problematic in the absence of planned or post-hoc crosssectional comparisons. For example, Merry, McDowell, Wild et al (2004) reported a significant difference favoring the intervention using area under the curve analyses over the post-intervention and 18 month follow-up periods. Based on their graphs however, it appears that at two if not all three follow-up assessments (6, 12, and 18 months) the error bars overlap between conditions.…”
Section: Concerns About Statistical Analyses and Outcome Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, only one previous study compared a CBT depression prevention program to an active placebo control condition or alternative intervention. Merry, McDowell, Wild, Bir, and Cunliffe (2004) found that a universal CBT depression prevention program with an interpersonal focus produced significantly greater reductions in depressive symptoms from pre to post than an arts and crafts intervention, though effects faded over follow-up. It is vital to compare prevention programs to placebo or alternative intervention control groups because without such control conditions it is not possible to know whether improvements resulted because of the specific therapeutic procedures theorized to produce intervention effects, general nonspecific effects common to all psychosocial interventions (e.g., attention, therapist competence), or design artifacts (e.g., participant expectancies, demand characteristics).…”
mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[4] Their benefits when applied universally are less certain. [4][5][6][7][8] For the most part, they are face-toface group programs delivered by mental health workers, or by the school's teachers specifically trained in the particular program. The need for staff training and support means the programs are often resource intense, costly, and difficult to sustain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%